Notes from the Underground


Advanced Search

This is the first book of a series of novels that form Dostoevsky's "second period" works, which includes "Crime and Punishment", "Karamazov Brothers", "The Idiot" and others. Though a short novel compared to the ones mentioned, we can find here the seeds of many subjects Dostoievsky was to develop further in his subsequent works.

The book is divided into two parts. In the first one, the main character -an obscure student whose name is not even mentioned- introduces himself as a sick and spiteful man. He makes a long diatribe against subjects such as free will, rationalism and romanticism. He attempts to explain his ideas of life and the quest of being, relating man with a piano keyboard: man does not want to think of himself as an instrument that can be played by a superior force without having the power to use his will; rather he has to demonstrate he is a human being with an inner and singular self and not just a piece that belongs to a bigger mechanism.

In the second part, this troubled man engages in telling us his difficulties to relate to other people. Here the author brings some characters into the scene, whose principal role is to show the main character's incapability to interact in society. The scene in which he delivers a wordy speech to a young prostitute in a dark cubicle is particularly touching.

Fan of this book? Help us introduce it to others by writing a better introduction for it. It's quick and easy, click here.

  • Quizzes on Notes from the Underground

    No quizzes available to take yet.

Please submit a quiz here.


Recent Forum Posts on Notes from the Underground

Notes From Underground & Alienation

Okay, so I'm looking for quotations that will aide me in talking about alienation, from the book Notes From Underground by Fyodor Dostoevsky. Any help that you could provide would be excellent. Thanks :) :)


Themes of "Notes from the underground"

Hi all, I will be brief to ensure that I do not look like I am cheating for my ISU project. But I need to choose a book to read on my own that has a common theme with a book I am reading in class, and a movie. My idea here is Frankenstein and then Notes from the Underground, as I am told that Notes is an excellent portrayal of obsession and downfall/insanity (I know that downfall and insanity are different, but I think I will make the point that htey are on the same path... One is just further along than the other, and it depends where you start on that path) .... Before I commit to the book and make it my final choice, I wanted to double check on here: Any opinion? Is this book containing of the theme I am looking for? Note: I do not want much detail here, because I don't want to look like I am cheating. Realistically I just need a yes or a no answer on the topic.... Waste of time? Or good read for my theme? Thanks!


My rant about how good it is

This will become long and tedious but when I read this a few years ago I could hardly believe how amazing it was (still is). Dostoyevsky must have been one of the most insightful and intuitive people at that time. The way his central character thought was incredible. It was contadictory and the book was not afraid to expose the darker side of people's personalities. Also, is this just me or is the book intended to be humorous? My parents thought I was crazy for laughing my way through it but I found it had a wonderful touch of mockery in the way it depicted the main character. I am probably being completely ignorant here but I found some parts of the book hilarious. It seemed that he was using a lot of black humour and the part where he gave the example of a man growing to enjoy his toothache was very witty. Have I misinterpreted it entirely?


similar book

If you liked this story, you´ll might as well enjoy The Fatal Boots by Thackeray, or a short tale by Robert L. Stevenson, A Lodging for the Night, which is comprised in his New Arabian Nights. If I can make as bold as to quote the openning lines of a book still waiting its turn to be read, check them out: "Allow me to introduce myself—first negatively. No landlord is my friend and brother, no chambermaid loves me, no waiter worships me, no boots admires and envies me. No round of beef or tongue or ham is expressly cooked for me, no pigeon-pie is especially made for me, no hotel-advertisement is personally addressed to me, no hotel-room tapestried with great-coats and railway wrappers is set apart for me, no house of public entertainment in the United Kingdom greatly cares for my opinion of its brandy or sherry. When I go upon my journeys, I am not usually rated at a low figure in the bill; when I come home from my journeys, I never get any commission. I know nothing about prices, and should have no idea, if I were put to it, how to wheedle a man into ordering something he doesn’t want." Extract taken from The Uncommercial Traveller by Charles Dickens. Doesn´t it remind you a bit of NFTU? Any more suggestions would be appreciated!


Notes from Underground Online Version

Hi, I am writing a comparative, and I found notes from underground on this website, which is great. But I was wondering how I would go about citing that. I have to have embedded citations in my essay, but I don't know the actual page number from which I get a quote. Any help? Regards, aXis


Notes from Underground; and The Gambler

Hi, I decided to go with you guys and choose Notes from Underground as my second novel to compare to The Stranger by Albert Camus :). Now, I checked at my public library, and unfortunately, they only have "Notes from Underground; and The Gambler", which when checked on amazon is around 320 pages. It says on amazon though that the parts of the novel are separated (Notes from Underground & The Gambler). I just wanted to confirm that this book was exactly the same as the original "Notes from Underground", so I could still compare it to The Stranger? Also, if I decide to do Crime and Punishment, would it be more easily compared to The Stranger then Notes from Underground, or is Notes from Underground the best choice for me? Thanks. Regards, aXis


End

Amazing! truly genious, describing a madman and an anti-social man in full detail, going so deep as no other writer had gone that deep before.
I just wish they wouldn't cut out the rest of the novel, I'm badly interested what happens after.


My notes?

I CAN relate, though it seems that the whine that leaks from this book may never have a cork big enough to stop it. This enlightening and terribly sane novel is but a taste of the true feats man is able to endure. The inabilty to make life palatable is not a hindrance but more an acceptance of this futile, tasteless and grossly humorous mental reality. I relate to the "Underground" character because prose used to develope the picturesque view of existentialism is ambiguous. The ambiguity involved is both my vice and crutch to existence. It imparts flavor on my truth and puts my farthest from others views. DRIII


No Subject

it's a good novel but it's far away from perfect. the story is too pesimist however Dovstoievsky goes deep in the soul of the "underground man", it's like Nietzche said: "He's the only one psycologist i've learned from"


No Subject

I like how the book starts out, the first three sentences-

"I am a sick man...I am a spiteful man. I am an unpleasant man. I think my liver is diseased."

it's a great opening.


Post a New Comment/Question on Notes from the Underground




Shakespeare wrote over 150 sonnets!
Join our Sonnet-A-Day Newsletter and read them all, one at a time.
Email:
As Seen In: USA Today "Hot Sites"