Cold Ale - The Blokes' Thread!

[TurquoiseSunset]

Any normal unmarried guy gets to see quite a bit of lingerie in his time but why is it never so inspiring as that in the first picture? As you said, I'm still hoping.

The kind you usually see, Brian, is a little cheaper...and can also be worn under clothes...so we get our money's worth

[The Atheist]

As for the Ch.Latour Pauillac 1994, it is now retailing at £291.67 per bottle which is considerably more expensive than Newkie ( if you will forgive the vernacular) but I feel that the tone of the club would be irrevocably lowered if the Pauillac were to be served with pork scratchings.

How about a topic on ladies underwear, or sömething equally important, to get this thread back to where it belongs.

Two pictures of underwear below, One from Anne Summers and one from Damart. One is considered sexy, the other frumpy. Whats the difference ?(apart from about 30 quid)

Women wear the first one when they know it's going to be exposed and the second when they know it's not.

Any normal unmarried guy gets to see quite a bit of lingerie in his time but why is it never so inspiring as that in the first picture? As you said, I'm still hoping.

The only times that I've seen any really sexy lingerie worn with intent is actually during marriage. When a girlfriend goes out with her man, she's not thinking about turning him on, because if he isn't turned on by just being there, he wouldn't be there!

Couples, given the time and lack of competition unavailable to singles, have the opportunity to dress nicely both on top and underneath. Most sexy lingerie is designed to be worn without clothes.

[Emil Miller]

Women wear the first one when they know it's going to be exposed and the second when they know it's not.



The only times that I've seen any really sexy lingerie worn with intent is actually during marriage. When a girlfriend goes out with her man, she's not thinking about turning him on, because if he isn't turned on by just being there, he wouldn't be there!

Couples, given the time and lack of competition unavailable to singles, have the opportunity to dress nicely both on top and underneath. Most sexy lingerie is designed to be work without clothes.

Well I'm not getting married if that's what it takes.

[Scheherazade]

Scher...How can you talk about those poor models in that way! I'm sure they are both very respectable girls.

You misunderstand me...

I was merely refering to the garments they were modelling... Not the models themselves.

[The Atheist]

Well I'm not getting married if that's what it takes.

Hey, there are other beneits.

I'll let you know what they are when I remember them...

Or my wife tells me what they are!

[Scheherazade]

Please accept our deepest sympathies upon the not-so-unexpected demise of your thread.

Seems like you cannot find anything to post about unless a semi-clad lady is involved.

[kilted exile]

bah, not even 24hrs and they're reporting our demise. It's just we know how to enjoy silence a quiet drink and our thoughts. unlike you lot we dont need to be constantly talking.

[The Atheist]

bah, not even 24hrs and they're reporting our demise. It's just we know how to enjoy silence a quiet drink and our thoughts. unlike you lot we dont need to be constantly talking.

Methinks there's more than a snippet of posting-envy involved in it as well.

Being the alleged champions of talking [constant drivel], the girls are a bit embarrased to find that on a time/post rate, The Blokes' Thread is much bigger.

Why are women so obsessed with size?

[Scheherazade]

Methinks there's more than a snippet of posting-envy involved in it as well.

Being the alleged champions of talking [constant drivel], the girls are a bit embarrased to find that on a time/post rate, The Blokes' Thread is much bigger.

Why are women so obsessed with size?

Could a post get any more Freudian?



But, please rest assured that no envy was involved in the making of my previous post.

[The Atheist]

Could a post get any more Freudian?

I thought you'd like that!

[Virgil]

Please accept our deepest sympathies upon the not-so-unexpected demise of your thread.

Seems like you cannot find anything to post about unless a semi-clad lady is involved.

And what's wrong with that? Scantily clad women are all there really is to life.



Now the real question is why women decide to be so scantily clad for our entertainment?

[BienvenuJDC]

The kind you usually see, Brian, is a little cheaper...and can also be worn under clothes...so we get our money's worth

As I first started to read this I wasn't sure where you were going....

The kind you usually see, Brian, is a little cheaper...

I wasn't sure if you were talking about the garments or the women...fortunately you cleared it up with the rest of the statement.

[Emil Miller]

Could a post get any more Freudian?



But, please rest assured that no envy was involved in the making of my previous post.

I note that the sub-text to your avatar reads Piece de Resistance.
What we men prefer is Vive la Piece et a bas la Resistance. Especially if the piece in question is tres joli.

[BienvenuJDC]

I note that the sub-text to your avatar reads Piece de Resistance.
What we men prefer is Vive la Piece et a bas la Resistance. Especially if the piece in question is tres joli.

Come on, Brian, You'll have to translate that for some of the ignorant Americans here...and I mean ignorant in the most respectable way....meaning, I just don't know what that means.

[Scheherazade]

I note that the sub-text to your avatar reads Piece de Resistance.
What we men prefer is Vive la Piece et a bas la Resistance. Especially if the piece in question is tres joli.

Obviously joli is not an adjective to be associated with this pièce so it is OK that she is "Pièce de Résistance", I am sure.