Authors: 266
Books: 3,236
Poems & Short Stories: 4,271
Forum Members: 70,634
Forum Posts: 1,033,546
And over 2 million unique readers monthly!
Fan of this book? Help us introduce it to others by writing an introduction for it. It's quick and easy, click here.
| Art of Worldly Wisdom Daily In the 1600s, Balthasar Gracian, a jesuit priest wrote 300 aphorisms on living life called "The Art of Worldly Wisdom." Join our newsletter below and read them all, one at a time. |
Sonnet-a-Day Newsletter Shakespeare wrote over 150 sonnets! Join our Sonnet-A-Day Newsletter and read them all, one at a time. |
A WIW Discussion?
Back in the day, I looked on Wilkie Collins as a bizarre Dickens hanger on. I have softened since, in part due to a teacher on a 19th century literature group who was an astute Collins advocate. I read WIW shortly after university, but must have not read it well, since I can't remember much of the novel but for a fleeting passage. I have started it again if any lit netters would like to discuss the book informally. Warning: I am dreadfully slow and have been fingering my edition since before the death of my desktop in June, and I am still in the first chapter, but I am going to read it and get it done before Christmas:eek2:. Logos, if you do chance upon this post, offhand, do you know if LN has his later novel with the legless poet? I am sympathetic to Wilkie's sympathetic treatment of the disabled in the Victorian era, but I can look it all up on the by and by, I am being lazy.
Posted By Jozanny at Wed 5 Aug 2009, 8:54 PM in The Woman in White || 14 Replies
The Woman in White Chapter Summaries
Does anyone know where I can find them...I've searched far and wide The book is by Wilkie Collins (The Woman in White)
Posted By Formless at Mon 9 Apr 2007, 11:41 PM in The Woman in White || 0 Replies
First Response
Walter Hartright's narrative Hippolyta: This is the silliest stuff that ever I heard. Theseus: The best in this kind are but shadows, and the worst are no worse, if imagination amend them. :lol: Like Theseus, I am having to do a certain amount of 'amendment' to get enjoyment out of this novel. I notice the OU in the UK are using this as an example of the 'sensational' in literature - and I do see their point - my overall impression is of a superficial emotional line, written 'loud'. There are a number of ‘stock’ characters designed to be instantly identifiable – the poor madwoman, driven crazy, most likely, by some wicked man – certainly persecuted by him. Jane Eyre’s attic dweller at least went mad because of a genetic defect. An impotent relation – uncle by preference - so self-absorbed as to become wraith-like, and possibly malevolent. Shady servant in the background too. The young hero, spurned in love for lack of good timing – if only he had come sooner. We just know he is good-looking – though not handsome. What I am not sure of is how ‘stock ’these characters were at the time of writing. Melodrama (theatrical) thrived on the stockiness of its characters – and there is a great appeal in this instantaneous understanding – depth of emotion comes from the accompanying music – but the character tells you which emotion it is. And there has to be a comic element – foreign or working class. We’ve already had the ‘silly little man’, and the stupid child – and the milkmaid. Was it Tennyson who said we all need some melodrama in our lives? As for its reputation as the first detective novel - well, the classification, 'Soap Opera' seems better fitting. But that is exactly what it was – originally published in parts, in need of a cliff hanger to drag the readership back. There is the potential for an interesting rural/urban clash too: It is a long time since I read it and am dying to know . . . :flare: Ahhhh, I’ve been trapped in the spiders web of a plot!
Posted By akfarrar at Thu 26 Oct 2006, 2:44 AM in The Woman in White || 2 Replies