Literature Network » James Joyce » Ulysses
Ulysses
Ulysses has been labeled dirty, blasphemous, and unreadable. In a famous 1933 court decision, Judge John M. Woolsey declared it an emetic book--although he found it sufficiently unobscene to allow its importation into the United States--and H. G. Wells was moved to decry James Joyce's "cloacal obsession." None of these adjectives, however, do the slightest justice to the novel. To this day it remains
the modernist masterpiece, in which the author takes both Celtic lyricism and vulgarity to splendid extremes. It is funny, sorrowful, and even (in a close-focus sort of way) suspenseful. And despite the exegetical industry that has sprung up in the last 75 years,
Ulysses is also a compulsively readable book. Even the verbal vaudeville of the final chapters can be navigated with relative ease, as long as you're willing to be buffeted, tickled, challenged, and (occasionally) vexed by Joyce's sheer command of the English language.
Among other things, a novel is simply a long story, and the first question about any story is: What happens? In the case of
Ulysses, the answer might be Everything. William Blake, one of literature's sublime myopics, saw the universe in a grain of sand. Joyce saw it in Dublin, Ireland, on June 16, 1904, a day distinguished by its utter normality. Two characters, Stephen Dedalus and Leopold Bloom, go about their separate business, crossing paths with a gallery of indelible Dubliners. We watch them teach, eat, stroll the streets, argue, and (in Bloom's case) masturbate. And thanks to the books stream-of-consciousness technique--which suggests no mere stream but an impossibly deep, swift-running river--we're privy to their thoughts, emotions, and memories. The result? Almost every variety of human experience is crammed into the accordian folds of a single day, which makes Ulysses not just an experimental work but the very last word in realism.
Both characters add their glorious intonations to the music of Joyce's prose. Dedalus's accent--that of a freelance aesthetician, who dabbles here and there in what we might call Early Yeats Lite--will be familiar to readers of
Portrait of an Artist As a Young Man. But Bloom's wistful sensualism (and naive curiosity) is something else entirely. Seen through his eyes, a rundown corner of a Dublin graveyard is a figure for hope and hopelessness, mortality and dogged survival:
"Mr Bloom walked unheeded along his grove by saddened angels, crosses, broken pillars, family vaults, stone hopes praying with upcast eyes, old Ireland's hearts and hands. More sensible to spend the money on some charity for the living. Pray for the repose of the soul of. Does anybody really?"~
Fan of this book? Help us introduce it to others by writing a better introduction for it. It's quick and easy, click here.
Please submit a quiz here.
Recent Forum Posts on Ulysses
I've been reading Ulysses...
...and I must say, it's wonderful! After a brief hiatus from it for about a month, today I picked it back up and got through two episodes; I'm now at the beginning of Wandering Rocks (my edition doesn't label the episodes, but I've been using the online text as a guide). I've been interested in Joyce's work ever since, about a year and a half ago, I, as a timid little ember of a reading enthusiast, picked up A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man. Little did I know what I was doing. After trudging through the beginning, I started picking up momentum, understanding it more and more as I went on, and by the end found myself craving more. Soon after finishing it, I went to the bookstore and bought Dubliners, and read it all in a short time span; but, still I wanted something more. So, in August, I purchased Ulysses. So far, I've been just going along with what I've read and trying my best to understand what's happening (and I'm doing a fairly decent job at it, I think) until I finish it. After finishing it, I'm thinking of doing a more thorough job of reading it, but for now, I'm just intent on finishing it.
Posted By Zeniyama at Tue 10 Nov 2009, 7:16 PM in Ulysses || 10 Replies
Ulysses by James Joyce
'Deep' or nonsense? Would you recommend it?
Posted By African_Love at Mon 14 Sep 2009, 5:17 PM in Ulysses || 12 Replies
Ulysses Atempt
I read Dubliners by Joyce and absolutely loved it. I would like to read Ulysses sometime in my life time. However, I think I am in need of prep, alot. Ulysses is a complex work, to say the least. If I were to start it now, I wouldn't have the skill or the endurance to finish the thing. How should I proceed? Are there other complex works I should start out with? By the way I have started Portrait of an Artist as a Young Man.
Posted By winzer at Fri 7 Aug 2009, 6:06 AM in Ulysses || 9 Replies
Should I bother?
Well essentially, as the title suggests, should i bother reading this novel? Would it be too difficult for a 15 year old, as I've got the impression from people that the novel is simply inpenetrable except for the most hardened of readers.
Posted By Twhalley at Mon 3 Aug 2009, 6:04 PM in Ulysses || 1 Reply
U.P.: up
In Lestrygonians, Bloom meets an old girlfriend, Mrs Breen, who shows him a postcard received anonymously by her husband. Bloom reads it aloud: UP? Mrs Breen answers, U.P.: up, and goes on to explain that Mr Breen is suing the author of the postcard. My first reaction was that this is a death threat: U.P. spelling out 'up' emphatically, as in "your time is up". I don't think it specifies the type of action Breen is taking in sueing the author. I was intrigued by this episode so I read around a bit, and it seems to be assumed that he's suing for libel. The most common interpretation seems to be that Breen's erectile function is being called into question. But since Mrs Breen mentions her children earlier in her conversation with Bloom, this seems unlikely to me. Any thoughts?
Posted By Tsuyoiko at Thu 21 May 2009, 5:40 AM in Ulysses || 1 Reply
Gave up on Ulysses
Well, I started Ulysses, and it was just too much for me. I have been reading canonical works lately, as I am studying to be an English high school teacher, so I am familiarizing myself with works I never read. Since Modern Library ranked Ulysses first on its list of the 100 best English-language novels of the 20th century, I figured I would read the best. I even came here to get some advice, which I took some. I would read the summaries and analysis on Sparknotes. Barely in depth, but good enough to make me at least understand what was happening. So, I was reading when I realized I was torturing myself, so I quit. Do you think Joyce wrote this with the main goal of screwing with lit professors' minds? Because, it seems that way to me. He even said something like, "this book has enough puzzles in it to keep scholars busy for centuries." He couldn't have had the goal of creating it for entertainment purposes, or even "art for the sake of art," as it must have been a helluva job to write. My theory is this at least partly the case, and it seems kind of sadistic, don't you think? I also read a quote about Finnegan's Wake from Joyce that was something like, "It took me a lifetime to write it, it should take you a lifetime to read it." Ego, anyone? I'll probably read it eventually (an annotated version), but there is too much other stuff to read. EDIT: Could a mod change the title? I didn't know if the italics would work, and it obviously didn't.
Posted By Mutatis-Mutandi at Thu 19 Mar 2009, 4:56 PM in Ulysses || 20 Replies
Reading Ulysses
So, I'm reading Ulysses for the first time, and was wondering if anyone had any tips for me, other than having a dictionary handy, lol.
Posted By Mutatis-Mutandi at Sat 7 Mar 2009, 10:31 PM in Ulysses || 15 Replies
Aeolus episode of Ulysses question
I read Ulysses a few months ago (before joining the forum, for certain) and had several questions, one of which concerns this paragraph (which falls beneath the "ITALIA, MAGISTRA ARTIUM" headline in the seventh episode, Aeolus): "I have often thought since on looking back over that strange time that it was that small act, trivial in itself, that striking of the match, that determined the whole aftercourse of both our lives." I don't understand this. it doesn't seem like a piece of anyone's consciousness; it is in the past tense; how could it be? But the novel is narrated in third person, so if it's not S.O.C., where did this first person narrator appear from? What it seems like to me is Joyce mocking a popular contemporary novel or play or something; it's very dramatic, and it's not realistic at all to think that one act could determine the course of a life (unlike the novel itself: complete realism). What does anyone think?
Posted By amb at Tue 17 Feb 2009, 5:07 AM in Ulysses || 2 Replies
Ulysses
Has anyone read that before? Anyone patient enough to give me an exegesis please? I would really want to understand this novel. To me, the harder and cryptic it gets, the more I want to digest it. By the way, I found the almost every line nonsensical. Forgive my stupidity.
Posted By CataclySm1c at Tue 9 Dec 2008, 7:13 AM in Ulysses || 5 Replies
Is anyone interested in a Ulysses reading group?
I recently attended the James Joyce Summer School and left Dublin with such a love for Ulysses. I spent one week studying the novel and talking to great people about it and, honestly, I miss that experience. I live in Chattanooga, TN, so finding a Ulysses reading group will be hard to do. If anyone is interested in participating in an online reading group, please let me know. We could read it slowly, maybe concentrating on one episode a month while keeping conversations going about our experience with reading it. Also, if you've been thinking about picking it up, but have been intimidated or just haven't found the motivation, a reading group is a great way to approach such a huge text. You'll be spurred along by everyone's discussion and you'll get to see various points of view as you move along.
Posted By Victoria2133 at Fri 25 Jul 2008, 2:48 PM in Ulysses || 30 Replies