Page 24 of 28 FirstFirst ... 1419202122232425262728 LastLast
Results 346 to 360 of 409

Thread: The Worst Book You've Ever Read?

  1. #346
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    31
    Catch-22.

  2. #347
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Banff, Canada
    Posts
    171
    Oh please.

  3. #348
    Registered User Ane's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Copenhagen
    Posts
    24
    Quote Originally Posted by wat?? View Post
    I found both 'Mere Christianity' by C.S Lewis and 'The God Delusion' by Richard Dawkins to be very instructive in how to conduct a terrible argument based on ill drawn conclusions, but not very enjoyable. And while I'm sure that I have read worse books than these two, none have made as ugly an impression on me.
    Is this because you're a believer or because you thought they were poorly written? I haven't read either, so it's not to defend them, I'm merely curious, probably because I read a book by two Danish guys who wrote about us evil atheists and well, naturally that would make my list of one of the worst, but more out of personal convictions than taste. Which made me wonder how we even distinguish that and maybe it's subject for a completely different thread, I don't know

  4. #349
    Desperate Characters by Paula Fox

    Reviews of this one are almost unanimously positive, but I just could not enjoy it at all. If you look around you'll see people praising the prose as being worthy of Fitzgerald, it's the perfect length, gripping portayal of middle class ennui, etc., but it simply did not resonate with me.

    To be fair, I was tiring of postmodern literature so it may have been a timing thing, but I just can't believe that I'm the only person who didn't get into this one.

  5. #350
    Registered User Veho's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    In the attic
    Posts
    588
    Quote Originally Posted by wat?? View Post
    Oh please.
    Never heard of it.
    "...You are not wrong, who deem
    That my days have been a dream;
    Yet if hope has flown away
    In a night, or in a day,
    In a vision, or in none,
    Is it therefore the less gone?..." E. A. Poe

  6. #351
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Banff, Canada
    Posts
    171
    Quote Originally Posted by Ane View Post
    Is this because you're a believer or because you thought they were poorly written? I haven't read either, so it's not to defend them, I'm merely curious, probably because I read a book by two Danish guys who wrote about us evil atheists and well, naturally that would make my list of one of the worst, but more out of personal convictions than taste. Which made me wonder how we even distinguish that and maybe it's subject for a completely different thread, I don't know
    'Mere Christianity' is actually written in support of faith, despite the misleading name. And no, I am not religious myself.

  7. #352
    Registered User Ane's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Copenhagen
    Posts
    24
    Quote Originally Posted by wat?? View Post
    'Mere Christianity' is actually written in support of faith, despite the misleading name. And no, I am not religious myself.
    Ah my bad. Does correspond better with all the christian motifs in the Narnia books.

  8. #353
    Reprobate RaoulDuke's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Yorkshire
    Posts
    138
    Atlas Shurgged is probably the most tedious book I've ever read. I actually agree with a lot of Ayn Rand's Objectivist ideas, but the book was hopelessly repetitive and the characters were awfully black and white.
    "How vain it is to sit down to write when you have not stood up to live."

  9. #354
    Registered User kelby_lake's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    3,620
    Quote Originally Posted by mal4mac View Post
    In 'serious' literature camp. Henry James' "The Wings of a Dove" is now, for me, tying with the Bible, Lucretius, Joyce's Ulysses and Proust. Desert island reading if the island is in hell...

    How can you know if something is good or bad? Who could have thought Montaigne could be so good and Lucretius so bad, or that Dickens could be so good while Henry James is so bad? Guess you just have to read fifty pages and then give up if it feels like shovelling mud on the banks of the Styx. Helps to lose opinions like "James is a classic, I *should* read him."... Doesn't make the next hundred pages any better!
    I loved The Wings of a Dove but the thing with James is that his novels take a LONG time to get going. Once they do, they're great. Definitely watch the film of the novel, at least. It's one of the saddest stories I've ever read.

    To Kill A Mockingbird is very overrated.

  10. #355
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    3
    a kestrel for a knave was the worst book i have EVER read.... and i only read it because i was forced to... those damned lit teachers....

  11. #356
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    153
    The Handmaiden's Tale by Margaret Atwood.

    I know it's not the futuristic, totalitarian state setting because I like Orwell. I just can't read anything by Margaret Atwood, Helen Garner or Virginia Woolf without feeling like I want their main characters (and the writers of them) to perish out of existence. I cannot understand their kind of femaleness at all, similar to how I feel about Australia's first female prime minister, actually.

  12. #357
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    University or my little estate
    Posts
    2,386
    Quote Originally Posted by Emmy Castrol View Post
    The Handmaiden's Tale by Margaret Atwood.

    I know it's not the futuristic, totalitarian state setting because I like Orwell. I just can't read anything by Margaret Atwood, Helen Garner or Virginia Woolf without feeling like I want their main characters (and the writers of them) to perish out of existence. I cannot understand their kind of femaleness at all, similar to how I feel about Australia's first female prime minister, actually.
    I know, geeeez who keeps on letting these women out of the kitchen ?

  13. #358
    Seasider
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Eastbourne
    Posts
    525
    I thought The Life of Pi was the worst Booker Prizewinner I ever read until I remembered The Bone People I would have included Midnight's Children but I couldn't get past the first 50 pages.

  14. #359
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    3,093
    Quote Originally Posted by kelby_lake View Post
    I loved The Wings of a Dove but the thing with James is that his novels take a LONG time to get going. Once they do, they're great. Definitely watch the film of the novel, at least. It's one of the saddest stories I've ever read.
    I thought the film was excellent. The plot was great, I just found the soul-searching style excruciatingly slow. I might try one of his early novels - is "Portrait of a Lady" easier to get through?

    Anyone prepared to defend Lucretius? I found the Roman physics in De Rerum natura stultifyingly boring - as well as wrong! The Epicurean morality (of course) was excellent, but that only ran to a few pages... At least I saw why the Christians didn't bother burning that one... two hundred pages of Roman physics makes even Christian metaphysics look good...

  15. #360
    Registered User Emil Miller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    London, England
    Posts
    6,499
    [QUOTE=mal4mac;1022247]I thought the film was excellent. The plot was great, I just found the soul-searching style excruciatingly slow. I might try one of his early novels - is "Portrait of a Lady" easier to get through? /QUOTE]

    I haven't read Portrait of a Lady but you might care to read The Europeans or Washington Square which are considerably less verbose than James' other work. Whilst there is no way in which I would spend time reading Wings of a Dove or The Golden Bowl, his shorter novels make pleasant if not gripping reading with the possible exception of The Turn of the Screw.
    "L'art de la statistique est de tirer des conclusions erronèes a partir de chiffres exacts." Napoléon Bonaparte.

    "Je crois que beaucoup de gens sont dans cet état d’esprit: au fond, ils ne sentent pas concernés par l’Histoire. Mais pourtant, de temps à autre, l’Histoire pose sa main sur eux." Michel Houellebecq.

Similar Threads

  1. Albert Goldbarth: "Library" part 2
    By amuse in forum Poems, Poets, and Poetry
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-05-2004, 07:27 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •