
Originally Posted by
MarkBastable
I don't agree with Capote because I'm young - which I'm not - or because I like Capote - which I don't - but because I think it's a valid, if glib, encapsulation of what Kerouac did. What Kerouac did, I'd say, was little more than turning a magazine article into a philosophy. I don't think he captured an era at all -I think he attempted to capture the big idea of a tiny minority of a large country at a significant moment.
And I think that's a valuable thing to do. In fact, I think that's exactly what cutting edge fiction should do - it should universalise the specific. It should illuminate corners.
I just don't think Jack was very good at it.