Page 8 of 63 FirstFirst ... 3456789101112131858 ... LastLast
Results 106 to 120 of 939

Thread: Why I believe in God?

  1. #106
    You and me skasian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    423
    No, our God is beyond being our Father, protector and comfort zone.
    He is the King of Kings, the Lord of Lords and a merciful judge in the highest of the heavens.
    In the bible, He states that He is the Alpha and the Omega, The first and the Last.
    The creator of the universe, world, us and every organic substance in-between.
    Becareful on how you finalise your statement because quite frankly, you are wrong.

  2. #107
    .
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    heart
    Posts
    7,441
    Blog Entries
    460
    Blaze, all this universe is the energy of God.

  3. #108
    it is what it is. . . billyjack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    twin cities
    Posts
    474
    actually blaze is spot on.

    also. i'm tired of hearing that God " is the King of Kings, the Lord of Lords."

    sure its poetic and powerful. but when ideas need to be put down on paper poetically in order for the meaning to stick in folks minds', you can bet your jiblets someone is passing off sweet lies as truth.

    happy festivus! the "airing of grievances" begins amongst my friends tonight. then its on to the feats of strength tomorrow morning
    Last edited by billyjack; 12-25-2008 at 10:40 PM.

  4. #109
    .
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    heart
    Posts
    7,441
    Blog Entries
    460
    Quote Originally Posted by billyjack View Post
    actually blaze is spot on.

    also. i'm tired of hearing that God " is the King of Kings, the Lord of Lords."

    sure its poetic and powerful. but when ideas need to be put down on paper poetically in order for the meaning to stick in folks minds', you can bet your jiblets someone is passing off sweet lies as truth.
    Well if you are an atheist then it's natural for you to reject the King of Kings, the Lord of Lords. I'm saying this with a tiny bit of jest. My point is that we can discuss...perhaps if you disagreed with skasian using the term "King of Kings," etc., you could find something else of substance in her post to discuss? Just a thought.
    Last edited by NikolaiI; 12-26-2008 at 02:16 AM.

  5. #110
    Champion Pierogi Eater Mr. Vandemar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Where the Wild Things Are
    Posts
    91
    Today science has changed the way people live and think.
    Remember when the scientific revolution, the enlightenment, and the emergence of rationalism occurred? About the same time as...the emergence of liberalism and capitalism!

    Breaking things down into equalities and CONVERTIBILE values (subatomic particles, atoms, molecules, moles, etc.) allows us to mechanize the world. This is advantageous to the economy and its masters. We see things, no longer as romantic / mysterious or inherent, but as combinations of various units. These units can be given values, which can be then exchanged for capital. Can you put a value on God? No, so...where does He fit into this capitalist mindset? He doesn't.

  6. #111
    You and me skasian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    423
    Quote Originally Posted by billyjack View Post
    also. i'm tired of hearing that God " is the King of Kings, the Lord of Lords."

    sure its poetic and powerful. but when ideas need to be put down on paper poetically in order for the meaning to stick in folks minds', you can bet your jiblets someone is passing off sweet lies as truth.
    Just as NikolaiI has kindly said, we can discuss something else in the substance.

    I too consider that any atheist will disapprove with God being King of Kings and the Lord of Lords as they simply do not approve God being our God. Describing our God as King of Kings to such firsttime believers or atheists I believe won't get any where. However with an elaborated explanation of the reason why He is so may be suffice. But most of the time, elaborated explanation do not hinder the atheists' heart as it takes more than our words to formulate faith. It takes the Holy Spirit to create faith and eyes to see the power of our God.

  7. #112
    You and me skasian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    423
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr. Vandemar View Post
    Remember when the scientific revolution, the enlightenment, and the emergence of rationalism occurred? About the same time as...the emergence of liberalism and capitalism!

    Breaking things down into equalities and CONVERTIBILE values (subatomic particles, atoms, molecules, moles, etc.) allows us to mechanize the world. This is advantageous to the economy and its masters. We see things, no longer as romantic / mysterious or inherent, but as combinations of various units. These units can be given values, which can be then exchanged for capital. Can you put a value on God? No, so...where does He fit into this capitalist mindset? He doesn't.
    I have deep passion in science, especially in biology, chemistry and psychology. But the reason why I do not compare with religion is because science is a manmade field. It is extremely limited and always uncertain. It is true that science indeed have changed our perspectives in life however as spiritual wise, we have not. Science, serves us in the physical world, as it constantly improves our capabilities of living. However, again, spiritual wise, improves nothing. My point is that science do not touch the spiritual level therefore undebatable in the topic of religion. (Unless you are a Tom Cruise fanatic and believe in scientology)

  8. #113
    Champion Pierogi Eater Mr. Vandemar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Where the Wild Things Are
    Posts
    91
    I agree with you. However, I think that it does not improve our capabilities of living. It is utilized by the powerful and unavailable to the weak.

  9. #114
    it is what it is. . . billyjack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    twin cities
    Posts
    474
    Quote Originally Posted by skasian View Post
    Just as NikolaiI has kindly said, we can discuss something else in the substance.

    I too consider that any atheist will disapprove with God being King of Kings and the Lord of Lords as they simply do not approve God being our God. Describing our God as King of Kings to such firsttime believers or atheists I believe won't get any where. However with an elaborated explanation of the reason why He is so may be suffice. But most of the time, elaborated explanation do not hinder the atheists' heart as it takes more than our words to formulate faith. It takes the Holy Spirit to create faith and eyes to see the power of our God.
    Quote Originally Posted by NikolaiI View Post
    Well if you are an atheist then it's natural for you to reject the King of Kings, the Lord of Lords. I'm saying this with a tiny bit of jest. My point is that we can discuss...perhaps if you disagreed with skasian using the term "King of Kings," etc., you could find something else of substance in her post to discuss? Just a thought.
    first off, i'm not atheist. that said, i think questioning the wording that is used in regards to God is not something that need be brushed off hastily, nor is it lacking in discussional substance. my beef with "king of kings" is that its elitist. by saying "lord of lords" you're automatically saying that you're god is the god of any other gods that might be out there. wording like this breeds resentment from other religions and it gives over-zealous Christians that phony sense of pride and holier than thou mentality that comes with thinking they have a monopoly on truth.

  10. #115
    Don't worry, Be Happy
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    83
    I will tell a story that I read many years ago but which has stayed with me since then. The story I write from memory and some sentences I have made up as I don’t exactly remember what was written, but the gist of the story remain unchanged:

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Long, long ago, Gods used to dwell in midst of human beings. One such God was Gujguj God who lived in a prosperous village. Gujguj God had a very good standing in the village and villagers would flock to him in their good times or bad times. In the village there also lived a simple, honest and hardworking farmer with his family. Gujguj God spoke highly about him to the people who would visit him.

    One day the farmer came running to the Gujguj God and wailed, “ Gujguj God! Gujguj God! My crops have been destroyed completely in floods. How will I now feed my family? Please help me.”

    Gujguj God told farmer not to worry unnecessarily. He told him, “ You have a good reputation in village. You ask for money or grains from other farmers as loan. No one will refuse you. Then once you get back to your original position, you slowly repay the loan back.”
    Hearing this, the farmer quietly went back to his place and did as the Gujguj God told him to do.

    Few months later, the farmer once again came running to Gujguj God in great despair, “Gujguj God! Gujguj God! Both of my children have suddenly died due to a mysterious fever. What is the purpose of my life now? Please bring them back to life”

    Gujguj God listened to the farmer’s lamentation quietly. Then he said,” My son, it is the rule of creation that one does not return from death. But your wife is young and capable of bearing many more children. Go, and raise the family again.”

    The poor farmer quietly returned to his home.

    Not many months have passed, when the farmer again came running to the Gujguj God in a completely distressed and breakdown condition and wept: “ Gujjuj God! Gujguj God! My beloved wife has died just now of a snake bite. I am finished. Please, please get her back to me or bring death for me.”

    Gujguj God looked solemnly at the farmer and said.” My dear son, life is sacred and not to be frittered away lightly. You are young and handsome. While coming to my adobe, you must have passed the well outside the village and must have seen beautiful maidens returning home carrying water. You should marry one of those girls and start all over again.”

    Hearing this the farmer was suddenly filled with a blind rage. He looked around and saw an axe for cutting wood in Gujguj God’s hut. Picking it up and in one mad blow he chopped one hand of the Gujguj God. Gujguj God cried in pain.” Oh! My hand. What are you doing?”
    The farmer replied.” Don’t worry about a lost hand. You still have one hand with which you can perform all the necessary functions.”
    Then he lunged again at the Gujguj God and with another mighty blow cut off his one leg. The Gujguj God cried with unbearable pain.” Oh! My leg. Have you gone mad?”
    The farmer replied,” Don’t worry about your lost leg. Look at the sun set. See, how beautiful the setting sun and the scenery all around is looking.”

    From that day onwards, all Gods decided to become dumb to the calls of human beings and turned themselves into statues of stone.
    --------------------------------------------------------

    I see this story from three angles.

    First, I see it written by a writer with an atheist outlook. The writer is sneering at the God’s lofty concepts and theories and is probably trying to say- the real world runs on its own style and God sermons and concepts don’t play much role in people’s lives. Unpredictable may happen and leave you devastated and no God is coming to help you in the manner you want.

    Secondly, I see the story from believers angle.
    The believers can be divided into semi-believers and true believers.
    The semi believers, believe in a God when life is running good and smooth and is manageable. When hardships begin to come, when living life begin to get difficult, when there are unnatural deaths in families, or a person is permanently handicapped, when something bad and irreversible happens, when you loose a good job, you find that your spouse or lover is cheating on you, your kids get spoilt and other such things, then the faith of these people get snapped, as happened in the case of the farmer in the story. Such people keep toggling between God or no God.

    Lastly, I think what if farmer was a true believer in Gujguj God. ( Gujguj God way of speaking was tactless but it still had the wisdom of the world. Also Gujguj God was just one of the God, and not the universal God I started the thread with). What the modern self-help experts would have told the farmer. It would have been more or less to what Gujguj God said.- Past is bucket of ashes. Live in present. Get over your grief. Start life all over again. When you really work at something, new avenues open before you. Everything get all right with time.

    If the farmer had followed the Gujguj God unconditionally, he would have married a girl once his grief was over. May be that girl would have given her more love than her dead wife. May be the children would have been better.

    I think of true believers as people who when struck by a great personal tragedy may despair, but do not leave God. They accept good or bad as will of the God and believe in God unconditionally. I think they also possesses selflessness.

    I also believe that if you try to lead such life, God takes care. You may get your share of pains and heartbreaks but you will also get your share of happiness and sunshine.

  11. #116
    You and me skasian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    423
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr. Vandemar View Post
    I agree with you. However, I think that it does not improve our capabilities of living. It is utilized by the powerful and unavailable to the weak.
    What do you imply by science being unavailable to the weak and only utilized by the powerful? Do you imply the powerful as people that are intellectually superior than average and weak as the intellectually inferior?

    What are the reasons that make you think that science does not improve the capabilities of living? Isn't it true that science and its technology that is based on it improve the standards of living? For example by increased knowledge of biochemistry and study of the immune system help us to take necessary drugs and medicine to improve our health. Improving health also improves our capabilities of living.

  12. #117
    You and me skasian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    423
    Quote Originally Posted by billyjack View Post
    first off, i'm not atheist. that said, i think questioning the wording that is used in regards to God is not something that need be brushed off hastily, nor is it lacking in discussional substance. my beef with "king of kings" is that its elitist. by saying "lord of lords" you're automatically saying that you're god is the god of any other gods that might be out there. wording like this breeds resentment from other religions and it gives over-zealous Christians that phony sense of pride and holier than thou mentality that comes with thinking they have a monopoly on truth.
    Let me elucidate. When God said that he is King of kings and Lord of lords, he is implying that he is above anything in the world as he has created the world. By other kings and lords, he means by the people that are identified as kings and lords in earth. It is known that in the ancient times that kings and lords were ascended to earth by God Himself. Therefore God is saying that he is above all the people that are highest standing in earth. In other words, in hierarchy, we appoint the leader as alpha male. In the same line, God identifies Himself as the alpha, therefore leader and also the leader of all leaders that stood in earth. To be more specific, he is the overall King and Lord for mankind.

  13. #118
    it is what it is. . . billyjack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    twin cities
    Posts
    474
    Quote Originally Posted by skasian View Post
    Let me elucidate. When God said that he is King of kings and Lord of lords, he is implying that he is above anything in the world as he has created the world.
    na uh. for instance. i dont think a great writer would put himself above his masterpiece. rather, he'd probably think the masterpiece above him in that he was "in the zone" (to use a michael jordan phrase) and he himself was not so much responsible for the finished product, but rather a median through which the product, in this case a book, found its completion.

    Quote Originally Posted by skasian View Post
    By other kings and lords, he means by the people that are identified as kings and lords in earth. It is known that in the ancient times that kings and lords were ascended to earth by God Himself.
    appeal to the past and an appeal to an unreliable authority. people were throwing around stone tools when that line of reasoning worked

    Quote Originally Posted by skasian View Post
    Therefore God is saying that he is above all the people that are highest standing in earth. In other words, in hierarchy, we appoint the leader as alpha male. In the same line, God identifies Himself as the alpha, therefore leader and also the leader of all leaders that stood in earth. To be more specific, he is the overall King and Lord for mankind.
    alpha males allow their status as "alpha" to be challenged. when they get old and brittle, such as the christian ideal of god, they lose their status as alpha and typically get thrown out of the pack. this isnt to say that god is dead, but i am saying that old ideas about god have become unbelievable (to paraphrase Nietzsche)

  14. #119
    .
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    heart
    Posts
    7,441
    Blog Entries
    460
    Quote Originally Posted by billyjack View Post
    na uh. for instance. i dont think a great writer would put himself above his masterpiece. rather, he'd probably think the masterpiece above him in that he was "in the zone" (to use a michael jordan phrase) and he himself was not so much responsible for the finished product, but rather a median through which the product, in this case a book, found its completion.

    appeal to the past and an appeal to an unreliable authority. people were throwing around stone tools when that line of reasoning worked

    alpha males allow their status as "alpha" to be challenged. when they get old and brittle, such as the christian ideal of god, they lose their status as alpha and typically get thrown out of the pack. this isnt to say that god is dead, but i am saying that old ideas about god have become unbelievable (to paraphrase Nietzsche)
    God is not simply an alpha male. God is OM. God is God. There are many ways to think of Him. He is the male and the female aspect of the divinity. The female aspect of God is love of God personified.

    Think of the universe. Now what does the universe come from? Everything that exists has an essance, a substance of some kind. Everything has a source. The source which is the original source is God. Whether God is personal or impersonal is not an issue until it's understood that God exists, personal or impersonal. Everything has a source and God is the original source - this may seem abstract. But can we infer anything about the source - God? We can infer that the source is Complete, and it is perfect, that in the source, the forms of everything which comes after it already exist.

  15. #120
    it is what it is. . . billyjack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    twin cities
    Posts
    474
    Quote Originally Posted by NikolaiI View Post
    Think of the universe. Now what does the universe come from? Everything that exists has an essance, a substance of some kind. Everything has a source. The source which is the original source is God. l. Everything has a source and God is the original source - this may seem abstract. But can we infer anything about the source - God? We can infer that the source is Complete, and it is perfect, that in the source, the forms of everything which comes after it already exist.
    you say the universe comes from god. i say it doesnt come from anywhere bc there is nowhere outside it for it to come from.

    everything has a source? you could go on and on ad infinitum looking for the source of things. at some point you randomly stop and say, God! rather than looking back to a source or a cause, might be more helpful to admit the arbitrariness of this and look around at what is--after all, isnt talk of source and cause only a means to understand what is? what better way to do this than to ditch the old witchcraft of "looking back" to prove/justify the present

Page 8 of 63 FirstFirst ... 3456789101112131858 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •