I find that the best understanding of Pride and Prejudice and of Emma lies in the titles chosen by Austen. The polysyllable one contrast with the abruptness of the other. In analogy of wine, the former is like Bordeaux while the latter is like Ice wine, picked when the frost has concentrated the flavor. Elizabeth is youth exploring possibilities while Emma is approaching spinsterhood without much understanding of her role in the Arcadian setting that is Austen's world. The scaffolding in both novels is marriage but the descriptive irony in Pride and Prejudice is structured on the minor characters while in Ema it is concentrated on the heroine herself. In Emma, Austen is surer of her skill, rarefies with a finer sieve.
Elizabeth is enchanting, mischievous and beloved by the majority of readers, while Emma is almost nasty. Both moderate their exuberance, marry older men of wealth. Cap their flowing hair with a mob cap and assume their place in the respectability and order that Austen sought as the English eden.


Reply With Quote

