Thanks for the backup, #57. You have nicely pointed out something I think we lose sight of when we examine "Shrew." We are so so so sensitive today to any perceived "oppression" of women, minority groups, etc...that we forget that all these groups are still comprised of human beings - and, as such, are all prone to similar behaviors, male or female, black, white or whatever. People are very quick to see the play in chauvanist terms - but it is not Kate's femininity Petruccio wishes to "tame" - it is her rage, her impotent hostility at the world around her; and, granted, she has reason to be angry. The play hints clearly that Bianca is the "favored" daughter and that Kate may well be the "problem child" of Baptista. If Kate had "tamed" Petruccio, wouldn't the feminists simply applaud Shakespeare's "modern" ideas of how men need a woman's "refining" touch? But, only if it's a man doing the "taming" do people get uncomfortable because any assertiveness by a male towards a female is perceived as "oppression." Without Petruccio's "taming," what did Kate stand to gain from her railing against the world? Nothing. Petruccio rescued her from herself - there are few demonstrations of love greater than that.


Reply With Quote
X) I am just speaking-er-typing my mind.

