garr, it be gold or nuthin fer me lass.![]()
garr, it be gold or nuthin fer me lass.![]()
---------------
Stanislaw Lem
1921 - 2006, Rest In Peace.
"Faith is, at one and the same time, absolutely necessary and altogether impossible"
oh aye I fergot ye are a higher class pyrate. in that case I be keepin that black parl and makin me way over to a jewry shop. I be too tired to roam the seas as I must be back to make me scurvy family dinner. so I be stealin the best gold and bringin it to ya dastardly stan. oh and I be grateful if you kin visit me in jail afterwards. I need to keep up me rum.
Dear All,
This thread has been posted by the Admin as a reminder about Forum Rules and related discussions. Please post in other threads such as Live Chat for daily conversations.
Thank you!![]()
~
"It is not that I am mad; it is only that my head is different from yours.”
~
sorry m'am.Originally Posted by Scheherazade
![]()
---------------
Stanislaw Lem
1921 - 2006, Rest In Peace.
"Faith is, at one and the same time, absolutely necessary and altogether impossible"
aye lassie will do
Hum I agree. I never swear, and anyways, it's extremely unpolite for a lady to talk with that manner. I only say s*** once in a while, but that's hardly a swear word, at least in my country...Originally Posted by Stanislaw
This thread should be called, "Don't use swear words that Americans understand". There are plenty of words that we use in England that get past the filters.
I am of course, far too polite to use any of them. I'm just not that kind of wanker.![]()
K. Needs to be said.
A few days ago, in this forum:
http://www.online-literature.com/for...396#post164396
I posted the following:
This text is from a poem by a published, award-winning poet, Bart Baxter. But the filter mangled it. So, I posted a clarification (if you're really interested in knowing how, go there). I tried to be subtle about it.Originally Posted by [todhackett
So, first thing--
Normally, I agree with the filter thing-- and I work as an information professional. I think a filter is necessary. Totally. No question. But here I was quoting a published work, with the intention of discussing said work. And yes, the poem's coarse. And yes, it's gratuitous. And yes, it's abhorrent on all kinds of levels. But that's b/c the poet wrote it that way. He had a point in doing it, and it's essential to the work. ****, I could name half a dozen poets (Nikki Giovanni, Allen Ginsburg, Ezra Pound, Charles Baudelaire, Arthur Rimbaud, Jack Kerouac... see?) who used "profane" words as devices in their poetry. So, if I'm going to discuss that poetry, sometimes it's necessary to clarify, and that (sometimes) means dodging the filter. But I won't do it often, and only when it's necessary, and I will try to do it in a way that is not blatant.
Second thing--
TOTALLY disagree. See above.Originally Posted by stanislaw
Hope this doesn't get me expelled or branded in some way. But really, I'm pretty passionate about this, and I felt it needed to be said.
The mass and majesty of this world, all
That carries weight and always weighs the same
Lay in the hands of others; they were small
And could not hope for help and no help came...
-W.H. Auden, "The Shield of Achilles"
Well, it isn't as if we're dim-witted enough not to know what it says or means in a quoted work, right?
Por una cabeza
Si ella me olvida
Qué importa perderme
Mil veces la vida
Para qué vivir
RH3K--
Didn't mean to insult anyone. Sorry if that's how I came off.
Thing is, there are at least two words I can think of that fit here (both in terms of # of letters and in terms of the rhyme scheme and feel of the poem), and there are probably far, far more than that. Take a look at my original post. My effort was to quote the text as the author wrote it, and so I wanted to be specific.
Didn't mean to offend... or if I did, I meant to do it in order to provoke intelligent, civil discussion.
Last edited by TodHackett; 03-02-2006 at 04:03 PM. Reason: Why put it in my words, when Eliot is so much more eloquent...
The mass and majesty of this world, all
That carries weight and always weighs the same
Lay in the hands of others; they were small
And could not hope for help and no help came...
-W.H. Auden, "The Shield of Achilles"
I did go a bit overboard with the bolds and italics. Sorry.
The mass and majesty of this world, all
That carries weight and always weighs the same
Lay in the hands of others; they were small
And could not hope for help and no help came...
-W.H. Auden, "The Shield of Achilles"
Don't worry, I didn't mean it in an insulted tone--I know what you meant, I was just making a point. No harsh feelings whatsoever, Tod.
Por una cabeza
Si ella me olvida
Qué importa perderme
Mil veces la vida
Para qué vivir
Tod, it doesn't matter, world-renowned published poetry or just foaming-at-the-mouth raving, it all gets filtered, it's part of the software. Nobody said you can't discuss a poem that happens to contain swearwords![]()
Roses are #$%$# red
Violets ared @#$%@#^ blue
and I think $#%@# is #$%#@% a #$!@$ pickup truck.
![]()
heh, just joking.
Poetry as such uses these expressions to shock its readers into "getting the point" but is it really needed, I mean ozymandeus is a powerfull piece of prose and yet there is no "I am Ozzyman, the baddest $%@#$ in the land @#$%@#$#$ look on my #$%@# works ye #$%@# mighty and kiss my $%@# you #$%#@ pig eating sons o #$%#$%."
I stand by my opinion: tis not needed.
---------------
Stanislaw Lem
1921 - 2006, Rest In Peace.
"Faith is, at one and the same time, absolutely necessary and altogether impossible"
Is that Mr. Osbourne's rendition?
Por una cabeza
Si ella me olvida
Qué importa perderme
Mil veces la vida
Para qué vivir