Buying through this banner helps support the forum!
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 25 of 25

Thread: The Real Deal ?

  1. #16
    Registered User Emil Miller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    London, England
    Posts
    6,499
    Quote Originally Posted by YesNo View Post
    I can see why the 9/11 attacks were used as an excuse to invade Iraq since both the US and Saudi Arabia would want to find some excuse. I can also see how they would be willing to fabricate excuses such as the weapons of mass destruction charge which was shown to be false based on UN inspectors not finding any such weapons. I can see how any excuse would be used or fabricated to justify such a war.

    My only concern is whether the destruction of the World Trade Center towers and the Pentagon were planned in any way by the US and Saudi Arabia to generate a sufficiently powerful excuse to invade Iraq. Or to put it more simply: Did the US and Saudi Arabia know about those attacks in advance?
    The implication is that the US and Saudi Arabia were involved in the 9/11 attacks.
    "L'art de la statistique est de tirer des conclusions erronèes a partir de chiffres exacts." Napoléon Bonaparte.

    "Je crois que beaucoup de gens sont dans cet état d’esprit: au fond, ils ne sentent pas concernés par l’Histoire. Mais pourtant, de temps à autre, l’Histoire pose sa main sur eux." Michel Houellebecq.

  2. #17
    Maybe YesNo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    For Mill, South Carolina
    Posts
    9,532
    Blog Entries
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by Emil Miller View Post
    The implication is that the US and Saudi Arabia were involved in the 9/11 attacks.
    Yes. That's what it sounds like.

    The video mentioned that Trump would release those 28 pages if he were elected. I've got my first and so far only reason to vote for Trump. I don't have any reason so far to vote for Clinton. That means it's 1 to 0, Trump vs Clinton. Interestingly I hear these are the most disliked candidates in polling history which fits my apolitical perspective of them: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/miles-...b_9721128.html

  3. #18
    Registered User Iain Sparrow's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    xxxxx
    Posts
    548
    Quote Originally Posted by YesNo View Post
    Yes. That's what it sounds like.

    The video mentioned that Trump would release those 28 pages if he were elected. I've got my first and so far only reason to vote for Trump. I don't have any reason so far to vote for Clinton. That means it's 1 to 0, Trump vs Clinton. Interestingly I hear these are the most disliked candidates in polling history which fits my apolitical perspective of them: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/miles-...b_9721128.html

    Seriously, you'd vote for a man that plans on walling off our southern border with Mexico, deporting ten million illegals, banning all muslims from immigrating to America, putting women in prison for having an abortion, and all the other nutty promises... because you believe in a conspiracy theory you watched on YouTube?!

    You sir, are part of a mob of morons following a lunatic.

  4. #19
    Registered User Emil Miller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    London, England
    Posts
    6,499
    Quote Originally Posted by Iain Sparrow View Post
    Seriously, you'd vote for a man that plans on walling off our southern border with Mexico, deporting ten million illegals, banning all muslims from immigrating to America, putting women in prison for having an abortion, and all the other nutty promises... because you believe in a conspiracy theory you watched on YouTube?!

    You sir, are part of a mob of morons following a lunatic.
    YesNo is entitled to his opinion, as is yourself, but unfortunately this has strayed into the realm of present-day politics which I was hoping to avoid by keeping it within the historical context of 9/11.
    "L'art de la statistique est de tirer des conclusions erronèes a partir de chiffres exacts." Napoléon Bonaparte.

    "Je crois que beaucoup de gens sont dans cet état d’esprit: au fond, ils ne sentent pas concernés par l’Histoire. Mais pourtant, de temps à autre, l’Histoire pose sa main sur eux." Michel Houellebecq.

  5. #20
    Maybe YesNo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    For Mill, South Carolina
    Posts
    9,532
    Blog Entries
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by Iain Sparrow View Post
    You sir, are part of a mob of morons following a lunatic.
    I sometimes think that myself.

    However, now that I've heard about the existence of those 28 pages, I would like to know what is in them. I don't care who releases them. I'd also like to know about the Apollo missions.

  6. #21
    Registered User Emil Miller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    London, England
    Posts
    6,499
    Quote Originally Posted by YesNo View Post
    I sometimes think that myself.

    However, now that I've heard about the existence of those 28 pages, I would like to know what is in them. I don't care who releases them. I'd also like to know about the Apollo missions.
    The problem with the redacted 28 pages is that Obama has said that he would be prepared to release them on condition that it didn't compromise national security.
    National security is a catch-all phrase that can cover a multitude of sins. If, for example, release of the unedited documents was considered likely to lead to civil unrest, then the national security card could, and probably would, be played so that only the most innocuous passages were made public.
    "L'art de la statistique est de tirer des conclusions erronèes a partir de chiffres exacts." Napoléon Bonaparte.

    "Je crois que beaucoup de gens sont dans cet état d’esprit: au fond, ils ne sentent pas concernés par l’Histoire. Mais pourtant, de temps à autre, l’Histoire pose sa main sur eux." Michel Houellebecq.

  7. #22
    Maybe YesNo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    For Mill, South Carolina
    Posts
    9,532
    Blog Entries
    2
    As I see it there are four possibilities:

    1) There is nothing to suggest either the Saudis or the US knew about the attacks in advance. No one needs to be protected by the secrecy of the document.

    2) Those pages claim the Saudis knew to some extent what was going to happen but no one else did. Keeping the documents secret is to protect the Saudis.

    3) Those pages claim even Bush and company knew something was going to happen but they did not know what was going to happen.

    4) Those pages claim that Bush and company knew all the details.

    I suspect 2 or 3 might be the case. However, I do recall the intensity of the arguments to show that there were weapons of mass destruction in Iraq even when the UN inspectors could not find evidence of WMD. So maybe the truth is closer to 4. However, if it is 4, I am surprised the secret has not been leaked by now. Maybe it has, but I am too politically naive to have seen it.

  8. #23
    Registered User Emil Miller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    London, England
    Posts
    6,499
    Quote Originally Posted by YesNo View Post
    As I see it there are four possibilities:

    1) There is nothing to suggest either the Saudis or the US knew about the attacks in advance. No one needs to be protected by the secrecy of the document.

    2) Those pages claim the Saudis knew to some extent what was going to happen but no one else did. Keeping the documents secret is to protect the Saudis.

    3) Those pages claim even Bush and company knew something was going to happen but they did not know what was going to happen.

    4) Those pages claim that Bush and company knew all the details.

    I suspect 2 or 3 might be the case. However, I do recall the intensity of the arguments to show that there were weapons of mass destruction in Iraq even when the UN inspectors could not find evidence of WMD. So maybe the truth is closer to 4. However, if it is 4, I am surprised the secret has not been leaked by now. Maybe it has, but I am too politically naive to have seen it.
    Yes, the WMD excuse and the search for Bin Laden casts doubt on the blame being directed at Iraq but there can be little doubt that 9/11 gave the US government carte blanche to attack any Muslim country without worrying too much about public disapproval.
    "L'art de la statistique est de tirer des conclusions erronèes a partir de chiffres exacts." Napoléon Bonaparte.

    "Je crois que beaucoup de gens sont dans cet état d’esprit: au fond, ils ne sentent pas concernés par l’Histoire. Mais pourtant, de temps à autre, l’Histoire pose sa main sur eux." Michel Houellebecq.

  9. #24
    Maybe YesNo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    For Mill, South Carolina
    Posts
    9,532
    Blog Entries
    2
    Bin Laden was a Saudi Arabian. That made me wonder why we were pointing the finger at Iraq.

    The problem with secrets is they justify anything my imagination might come up with. I wonder what really happened now that I know there is a mystery. But I am only curious. The Saudis will be punished enough when the price of oil finally tanks.

  10. #25
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    A rural part of Sweden, southern Norrland
    Posts
    3,123
    Yes, this cold war move by Obama also hits other countries than Russia, Norway is one as well. The Saudi Dictatorship is another.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Similar Threads

  1. No Deal
    By Delta40 in forum Personal Poetry
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 04-30-2012, 09:04 AM
  2. Deal or No Deal?
    By hillwalker in forum Short Story Sharing
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 07-31-2011, 10:32 AM
  3. real time...real life....we will see
    By kittypaws in forum Short Story Sharing
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 04-05-2011, 09:34 AM
  4. The Deal
    By gabe1scott in forum Short Story Sharing
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 09-14-2010, 04:00 AM
  5. HI EVERYONE I'M NEW!! (I know, no big deal)
    By XMyLove4BryanX in forum Introductions
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 12-23-2008, 07:27 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •