I never said you said he was. You did however say: "He thought more highly of Tolkien than he did of Joyce or Woolf...and Lewis was a man of dazzling learning." So, you were clearly implying Lewis' evaluation had legitimacy. As to Ulysses being "better" than Lord of the Rings, I will just say it was more of a linguistic, structural, psychological, and intertextual achievement that has had much greater influence on other great writers than LOTR has. Also, if one can't say Ulysses is better than LOTR, one also can't say LOTR is better than Twilight. Also, this century may be known as the century of Fifty Shades of Grey for all we know, that doesn't mean Twilight or LOTR is as good, or as much of an achievement, as Ulysses...Harold Bloom is hardly the final authority on the matter.
Neither are those J.G. Ballard critics you mention. Many critics, including myself, have included J.G. Ballard in the Postmodern literature canon and have also credited him with greatly influencing cyberpunk literature. So, I don't know what your critics expect more out of academic evaluation of Ballard, but it's certainly not poor right now.
P.s. What do you think about Ulysses and LOTR. How would you compare them and which do you think is the greater literary achievement?



Reply With Quote