Definitely not.
The news is usually only partially accurate anyways. I just finished reading a book on the Columbine High School Massacre, and almost everything I thought I knew about that day turned out to be wrong. The two murderers weren't being relentlessly bullied, nor were they part of the Goth crowd, both had good grades and were socially active, the local police department had over 20 registered complaints against the two boys and a judge authorized search warrant which was never executed... so you see, staying informed requires not being lazy, and reading books written long after events have played out.
Best to remain blissfully ignorant.
If you were a journalist and could go back in time, which historical event would you want to cover?



Reply With Quote