Page 27 of 28 FirstFirst ... 1722232425262728 LastLast
Results 391 to 405 of 409

Thread: The Worst Book You've Ever Read?

  1. #391
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Posts
    15
    Quote Originally Posted by lichtrausch View Post
    Why do you do that to yourself? After reading 2/3rds of The Alchemist I knew I was done with Coehlo.
    The Alchemist was the last one I read before completely giving up on him. I guess at the time I pushed myself to read his works since he's such a celebrated author around here (where I live) so I wanted to see what fuss was about.

  2. #392
    Pièce de Résistance Scheherazade's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Tweet @ScherLitNet
    Posts
    23,903
    Quote Originally Posted by TheAlertDriver View Post
    The Alchemist was the last one I read before completely giving up on him. I guess at the time I pushed myself to read his works since he's such a celebrated author around here (where I live) so I wanted to see what fuss was about.
    Same here. I am truly at a loss that why his sugar-coated, cliche-ridden, pseudo-philosophical and psychological works are proving to be so popular.
    ~
    "It is not that I am mad; it is only that my head is different from yours.”
    ~


  3. #393
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Posts
    15
    Haha sugar-coated and cliche-ridden indeed. His writing is straight forward with a simple inspirational message underneath. I think he appeals to people who are just starting to get into literature. If that's the case I guess he'll serve as an introduction then they'll move on to bigger things.

  4. #394
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    344
    Heart of darkness. Bored me, and I found Conrad's style very difficult to get into sync with. I remember having to adjust to Melville, but then really enjoying it in Moby Dick.

    Catch-22. Jeez, not funny at all in my opinion. Hated Yossarian.

    The Last of the Mohicans. If you've seen the movie with Daniel Day Lewis, then don't bother with the book, as the movie is so far above it as to make any kind of comparison unfair to the movie.

  5. #395
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    2
    Probably the "great American novel" named The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, written by Mark Twain.

    It's abysmal, and vastly overrated. I can't see how anyone ever made it past page one, but I know I sure tried. When I made it to the end, I realized that the only thing I had gotten out of reading it was a hatred for Huck Finn.

    I will try Tom Sawyer, eventually.

  6. #396
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    1,780
    Blog Entries
    7
    Quote Originally Posted by WriterMan View Post
    Probably the "great American novel" named The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, written by Mark Twain.

    It's abysmal, and vastly overrated. I can't see how anyone ever made it past page one, but I know I sure tried. When I made it to the end, I realized that the only thing I had gotten out of reading it was a hatred for Huck Finn.

    I will try Tom Sawyer, eventually.
    Poetaster, you have a companion in masochism!

  7. #397
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    17
    The worst book I've ever read would be a toss-up between Heller's "Catch 22" and "Our Mutual Friend" by Dickens. Joyce's "Portrait" was heavy going too and, oh, so was Richardson's "Pamela". You can see that I studied these for Literature at University, but that was over 25 years ago.

    "Catch 22" just wasn't funny; or, it was funny in a Mel Brooks way - i.e. HE thinks it's funny!!

  8. #398
    Registered User Emil Miller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    London, England
    Posts
    6,499
    Quote Originally Posted by Sarabande View Post
    The worst book I've ever read would be a toss-up between Heller's "Catch 22" and "Our Mutual Friend" by Dickens. Joyce's "Portrait" was heavy going too and, oh, so was Richardson's "Pamela". You can see that I studied these for Literature at University, but that was over 25 years ago.

    "Catch 22" just wasn't funny; or, it was funny in a Mel Brooks way - i.e. HE thinks it's funny!!
    Somewhere on this thread I think I've listed the worst book that I've read but I must admit that Catch 22 was a complete waste of time. Not only was it unfunny but it seemed to be making a comment about the futility of war in a juvenile sort of way and saying: 'Look how hip I am'.
    "L'art de la statistique est de tirer des conclusions erronèes a partir de chiffres exacts." Napoléon Bonaparte.

    "Je crois que beaucoup de gens sont dans cet état d’esprit: au fond, ils ne sentent pas concernés par l’Histoire. Mais pourtant, de temps à autre, l’Histoire pose sa main sur eux." Michel Houellebecq.

  9. #399
    Registered User Poetaster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Northeast England
    Posts
    467
    Quote Originally Posted by Lykren View Post
    Poetaster, you have a companion in masochism!
    I have to say, the company keeps me going, haha.
    'So - this is where we stand. Win all, lose all,
    we have come to this: the crisis of our lives'

  10. #400
    Registered User kev67's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Reading, England
    Posts
    2,458
    Quote Originally Posted by Sarabande View Post
    The worst book I've ever read would be a toss-up between Heller's "Catch 22" and "Our Mutual Friend" by Dickens. Joyce's "Portrait" was heavy going too and, oh, so was Richardson's "Pamela". You can see that I studied these for Literature at University, but that was over 25 years ago.

    "Catch 22" just wasn't funny; or, it was funny in a Mel Brooks way - i.e. HE thinks it's funny!!
    I thought the Milo Minderbender bits were good.
    According to Aldous Huxley, D.H. Lawrence once said that Balzac was 'a gigantic dwarf', and in a sense the same is true of Dickens.
    Charles Dickens, by George Orwell

  11. #401
    Registered User SJR90's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    South Dakota
    Posts
    11
    I just finished reading (and reviewing) Dean Koontz's Frankenstein: Prodigal Son. What a waste of time, but I couldn't bring myself to stop in the middle of it. I had to finish to see if it redeemed itself. It did not. Two things that make a great story great were completely void - no interesting characters or captivating plot. Koontz simply made Victor Helios (Dr. Frankenstein) way too smart (he had a machine designed for almost everything - impede aging, accelerate birth, download information directly to the brain, making an army of clones) and bastardized Mary Shelley's characters by placing them two hundred years into the future. If you haven't read the novel, don't even think about it! Koontz is very facile in his use of words, but his storytelling needs some serious modulating.

  12. #402
    somewhere else Helga's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    on the ice in the middle of the sea
    Posts
    2,741
    Blog Entries
    351
    Shirley by Bronte, I just didin't like it, don't know why just don't.
    I hope death is joyful, and I hope I'll never return -Frida Khalo

    If I seem insensitive to what you are going through, understand it's the way I am- Mr. Spock

    Personally, I think that the unique and supreme delight lies in the certainty of doing 'evil'–and men and women know from birth that all pleasure lies in evil. - Baudelaire

  13. #403
    Quote Originally Posted by Sarabande View Post
    The worst book I've ever read would be a toss-up between Heller's "Catch 22" and "Our Mutual Friend" by Dickens. Joyce's "Portrait" was heavy going too and, oh, so was Richardson's "Pamela". You can see that I studied these for Literature at University, but that was over 25 years ago.

    "Catch 22" just wasn't funny; or, it was funny in a Mel Brooks way - i.e. HE thinks it's funny!!
    Un-****ing-believable. Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man is incredible. Maybe it's because you were forced to study it that you didn't enjoy it, I find that sometimes.

  14. #404
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    344
    At the moment it's a tie with the not funny Catch-22 and the despair inducing Blood Meridian.

  15. #405
    Registered User SJR90's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    South Dakota
    Posts
    11
    Quote Originally Posted by Vota View Post
    At the moment it's a tie with the not funny Catch-22 and the despair inducing Blood Meridian.
    I've never read Blood Meridian, but a friend of mine did. The only book I've read by Cormac McCarthy is The Road, which I found to be very good, despite its appalling lack of character development.
    Never compromise. Not even in the face of Armageddon.

Similar Threads

  1. Albert Goldbarth: "Library" part 2
    By amuse in forum Poems, Poets, and Poetry
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-05-2004, 07:27 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •