Jackie O. wasn't that great looking. Had a goony looking face.Originally Posted by JBI
Jackie O. wasn't that great looking. Had a goony looking face.
Simply ignore it. This is the Internet even if it is there one has the power to stump it out by not clicking at it.
I once was working on a email and images of semi nude bodies were flashing as I typed I think it was an underwear company. It was distracting because I could not concentrate on my typing and so I picked up the phone and call the company making those adds.
They had them removed straight away. I never seen them again.
it may never try
but when it does it sigh
it is just that
good
it fly
Uhhhhh, qimissung was thanking the person for posting the link.
lol.
Love the irony in this picture.
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_a...lugin_activity
"The important thing is not to stop questioning. Curiosity has its' own reason for existing." ~ Albert Einstein
"Remember, no matter where you go, there you are." Buckaroo Bonzai "Some people say I done alright for a girl." Melanie Safka
You don't say. I know where I am spending my summer. South of France, I'm on my way.
Her hair was like a flowing cascade and her breasts were real awesome also.
My ***** Better Have My Money by Fly Guy
My ***** better have my money.
Through rain, sleet, or snow,
my ho better have my money.
Not half, not some, but all my cash.
Because if she don't, I'll put my foot dead in her ***.
A man was arrested in Sydney yesterday for taking upskirt photos of women without their knowledge. How does this differ?
Not all of them you want to see naked.
Other than Kate is famous and those women weren't, I don't see any difference
It does not differ only one does it for a living and the other I guess is because they can.
Also one gets arrested when one goes public doing such activity.
The culprit are quick to arrest.
Public to public is easy to deal with if the laws says that is inappropriate.
Royalty to paparassi is tricky especially if paparassi is foreign to the royalty they are involved with. Cases tend to drag and differ from country to country on the ground of cultural differences.
This is just an opinion.
it may never try
but when it does it sigh
it is just that
good
it fly
[IMG][/IMG]
Last edited by tonywalt; 10-03-2012 at 04:27 PM.
I don't know the various laws, but Kate Middleton, while famous, was on private property, so the photographers, I don't believe, had the right, legally, to take her picture and then make it public. If she'd been on a beach it would be a different matter.
The man in the pic above (lol) is clearly taking a picture of something, ahem, *private* and so is clearly in the wrong. If she was famous and he took a picture of her getting out of a car, then he's in the clear. There is a different standard for private and public citizens. This has probably already been discussed, so I'm sorry if it's redundant.
"The important thing is not to stop questioning. Curiosity has its' own reason for existing." ~ Albert Einstein
"Remember, no matter where you go, there you are." Buckaroo Bonzai "Some people say I done alright for a girl." Melanie Safka
My remarks were purely tongue and cheek.
My remarks, while not all that funny (or even funny at all), are still germane to the issue.
"The important thing is not to stop questioning. Curiosity has its' own reason for existing." ~ Albert Einstein
"Remember, no matter where you go, there you are." Buckaroo Bonzai "Some people say I done alright for a girl." Melanie Safka
I don't care whether it's Kate's boobs being exposed to the world or my mum's but if the pictures were taken whilst the person in question was on private property and did not give any permission for the photos to be taken then the photographer is definitely in the wrong.
(Though I probably would have a problem with my mum's boobs being all over the internet)
So we beat on, boats against the current, borne back ceaselessly into the past - The Great Gatsby
Give every man thine ear, but few thy voice - Polonius (Hamlet)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote