The Duchess of Cambridge's Breasts

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JBI

Jackie Kennedy's faded from imagination, so will these, Jacqueline Kennedy was at least super-good looking.

---

Jackie O. wasn't that great looking. Had a goony looking face.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by qimissung

I would like to thank whoever posted the link so I could go look at them. I cannot even fathom what it would be like to have so little privacy.

---

Simply ignore it. This is the Internet even if it is there one has the power to stump it out by not clicking at it.
I once was working on a email and images of semi nude bodies were flashing as I typed I think it was an underwear company. It was distracting because I could not concentrate on my typing and so I picked up the phone and call the company making those adds.
They had them removed straight away. I never seen them again.

Uhhhhh, qimissung was thanking the person for posting the link.

lol.

Love the irony in this picture.





http://www.slate.com/articles/news_a...lugin_activity

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Emil Miller

If you were to go to Cannes during the Summer, you would see plenty of topless women stretched out in the sun and nobody taking any notice.
What makes Kate Middleton any different except that she happens to be married to arch hooray William Windsor?

---

You don't say. I know where I am spending my summer. South of France, I'm on my way.

A man was arrested in Sydney yesterday for taking upskirt photos of women without their knowledge. How does this differ?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by E.A Rumfield

You don't say. I know where I am spending my summer. South of France, I'm on my way.

---

Not all of them you want to see naked.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sydneysider

A man was arrested in Sydney yesterday for taking upskirt photos of women without their knowledge. How does this differ?

---

Other than Kate is famous and those women weren't, I don't see any difference

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sydneysider

A man was arrested in Sydney yesterday for taking upskirt photos of women without their knowledge. How does this differ?

---

It does not differ only one does it for a living and the other I guess is because they can.
Also one gets arrested when one goes public doing such activity.
The culprit are quick to arrest.
Public to public is easy to deal with if the laws says that is inappropriate.
Royalty to paparassi is tricky especially if paparassi is foreign to the royalty they are involved with. Cases tend to drag and differ from country to country on the ground of cultural differences.
This is just an opinion.

[IMG]http://i140.photobucket.com/albums/r...55/upskirt.jpg[/IMG]

I don't know the various laws, but Kate Middleton, while famous, was on private property, so the photographers, I don't believe, had the right, legally, to take her picture and then make it public. If she'd been on a beach it would be a different matter.

The man in the pic above (lol) is clearly taking a picture of something, ahem, *private* and so is clearly in the wrong. If she was famous and he took a picture of her getting out of a car, then he's in the clear. There is a different standard for private and public citizens. This has probably already been discussed, so I'm sorry if it's redundant.

My remarks were purely tongue and cheek.

My remarks, while not all that funny (or even funny at all :D), are still germane to the issue.

I don't care whether it's Kate's boobs being exposed to the world or my mum's but if the pictures were taken whilst the person in question was on private property and did not give any permission for the photos to be taken then the photographer is definitely in the wrong.

(Though I probably would have a problem with my mum's boobs being all over the internet ;) )