Originally Posted by
lupe
You have every right not to "accept", nor "value", nor even "respect" all those who have spend a great deal of time examining those issues and have come to conclusions that do not unfortunately confirm you own beliefs. Obviously, these risk being most of them who "happen to be scientists". But then you are not advancing the "discussion" that you say you aim in the first place, at least not in a serious and constructive manner.
Your trick about the weather is catchy but does not resist any serious examination. You see, many people have of course different tastes about the weather, but warm and cold temperature can be very easily proven empirically. Again, you are trying to merge physics and metaphysics – something that does not really serve your purposes.
Nevertheless, if Swami Vivekananda is right, then "God" does not exist, since obviously not "all people are able to feel this", nor "it's perceptible to all"… ;)