Originally Posted by
Shield&Sword
Allow me to share my opinion,
Nizar Qabbani is considered by majority a "poet" for alot of reasons that has nothing to do with literature and poems but for other reasons that i dont want to discuss them now..
English literature differ from arabic literature, it depend more at the sound, it has it'sown identity every language has its own beauty and its shown in peoms, translating poems make it lose some (if not most) of its beauty, to enjoy a poem in my opinion it must be read in the original language only.
To understand my point try to translate one line from an old poem of Almotanabby, you wont be able, because the arabic poems have also their own identity, Sadr Agz, Qafyah that we cant find in other languages.
Nizar Qabbani is one of alot of people who pretend to be a poet but he couldnt fulfill the requests, he didnt have the toungue, he could be a writer but not a poet, so he and alot like him invented the New Poems (shi'r alhadatha) which intend to change the form of the arabic poems and to make it like the western poems (calling it الشعر النثري) and in order to make it public he mixed with porn, and most of the time he exagirated, he wrote porn poems in conservative (the positive meaning) sosciety, who supported him? ofcorse the poeple who want the conservative girl to spoil, and those who want athiesm to be diffused in these countries.
Look at his poems, where is his rich language, where is the true arabic poetry, the poems thbat could challenge Almotanabby and Thabit Ibn Hassan, Jamil Bothainah, Ibn tammam, Abo Ala'tahia, Mouhammad Iqbal (the bakistani), Ahmad Shaoqy.
This is my opinion in Nizar and Darwish and alot like them, men who couldnt be poets so they pretended to be.