Chapter, As Per BLP's Request...
This is an early chapter from the novel I am working on, The Legend of Skara Brae.
Some notes:
1. I'm sorry it's in all caps. In MS Word, I have it in "Small Caps", and there's a reason for this. Each of the five sections of my book has an interchapter-- I try (try) to model them on Steinbeck. This is one of those interchapters. I take a lot of liberties with different fonts in my book, so the small caps is sort of a way to set the interchapters off.
2. This chapter is an attempt to lay out the setting and play with various symbols. If you have any ideas or suggestions, or if something isn't clear, could be phrased better, doesn't make sense, etc.-- PLEASE tell me! I promise I'll be respectful.
3. I will provide more background to anyone who wants it. I will provide more chapters, too, if anyone's interested.
4. G#.
CHAPTER III:
“The Palouse”
"...Flee the minion. Be naked. Travel light. Because there will come catastrophe. Every night expect the flood, the earthquake, the fire, and think of the stock. Be in a position to lose nothing by it when the bombs fall..."
-Stanley Elkin, A Bad Man
SIX FIGURES RIDE ACROSS FORGOTTEN FIELDS. THEY ARE REFUGEES FROM TIMES AND PLACES IMMEMORIAL. THIS MASS OF WRETCHED REFUSE—THESE USED, BROKEN PEOPLE ARE COMING FOR... FOR WHAT? FOR WHAT THEY WILL, THEY RIDE SWIFTLY OVER HILL AFTER ROLLING HILL, THEIR HORSES BEAT A PATH THROUGH A VAST AND SHAPELESS PLAIN OF WHEAT.
THIS PLACE IS AN AEON CAPTURED IN A MOMENT; THE PRESENCE OF THIS PLACE, THE SUM OF TEN MILLION YEARS OF SLOW, STEADY PROGRESS. BUT EVEN THAT IS ACCIDENTAL—A TIRING, TORTURED CONCENTRATION OF CIRCUMSTANCE; OF CRUSHING ICE AND RUSHING WATER. THIS ARDENT, ACCIDENTAL STRUGGLE TOWARD DESTINY, LIKE A STUMBLING DRUNK LEAVING DEFT, DELIBERATE FOOTPRINTS IN THE SAND.
HERE STAND ROCKS REDUCED TO RUBBLE; RUBBLE DASHED TO DUST. AND HERE, AMID THE TEMPEST-TOSSED GRASSES, THE DUST IS PLAIN TO US, BUT THE WIND IS CONCEALED. IT IS ONLY IN MY MIND’S EYE THAT I SEE THE TRUE NATURE OF THIS PLACE: THIS GROUND OF SAND WAS ONCE A MOUNTAIN. THESE HILLS ARE THE RIPPLES ON A RIVERBED, THESE GRASSES THE ITENERANT SETTLERS IN A HARSH AND BARREN SARGASSO. HERE, A LAKE BREACHED ITS DAM A THOUSAND TIMES; HERE TORRENTS HAVE POURED OUT OVER THE THRISTY LAND TIME AND TIME AGAIN, CARVING IT LIKE A CARCASS.
AND THESE PEOPLE? THIS MASS OF MISPLACED MIGRANTS? WHAT PLAN PLOTS THEIR PROGRESS? BUT HERE, TOO, THERE IS NO DELIBRATION. THEY ARE THE FLOTSAM OF BROKEN SHORES; DRIFTWOOD UPON A VAST, UNEASY SEA. THEY HAVE COME FROM BROKEN FAMILIES, BROKEN HOMES AND CULTURES, BROKEN TIMES AND BROKEN PLACES. THEY TAKE FLIGHT TOWARD FANTASTIC FUTURES. THEY FLEE THE LAW; FLEE THE FORTUNATE, THE DESPERATE AND SLAIN; FLEE THE RESTRAINTS OF REFINED FREEDOM. AND HERE THEY HAVE ASSEMBLED, ON THE APPROACH TO THIS BROKEN CITY, WHERE THEY HAVE FOUND THEMSELVES AND BUILT THEIR OWN LIVES OUT OF SCRAPWOOD AND MUD.
THEY SEEK ADVENTURE, THESE OUTCASTS, OR GOLD, OR SPOILS, OR TALES OF SAME. THEY FLEE THEIR PAST IN ORDER TO UNLOCK THE SECRETS OF THEIR OWN HISTORY; THEY HAVE TRAVELED FAR.
AND NOW, THEY COME RIDING, RUSHING, TOWARD THE BROKEN WALLS OF SKARA BRAE. WITH EACH HOOFBEAT, GAINING FORCE; WITH EACH SWIRLING GUST OF WIND THEIR HURRICANE SOULS GATHER DETERMINATION, STRENGTH OF WILL. THEY GATHER WHAT THEY CAN AND LEAVE A TRAIL OF WASTE AND DEBRIS BUT THEY ARE HERE, THEY ARE ALIVE, THEY WILL KEEP MOVING.
THEY HAVE BEEN USED, BROKEN, SCATTERED—THEY ARE NO COMMON ENEMY. THIS HORDE, THIS WRITHING, SCREAMING TORNADO WHIRLING ABOUT ITS EMPTY CORE. IT COMES, WHISPERING THROUGH DOORWAYS, SHATTERING THROUGH LOCKS.
Thank you for your time. I must go now, but I will be back shortly.
Have you seen the SNL "Amerida" sketch with Phil Hartman?
Forget it. I'm too juiced up now to sleep.
Quote:
Originally Posted by blp
Thanks for posting, Tod. I'm probably totally the wrong person to comment on this since, it turns out, it's not the sort of thing I'd usually read...
It's that bad, huh? (SIGH!)
Well, alright. Maybe it's utter crap. But I'm still gonna give the contest a shot...
I think I addressed most of your comments on the first paragraph of my chapter in the response to XC. Let me say it again-- I have never liked this paragraph. It is the red-headed stepchild of this chapter, and it's brought me nothing but trouble!
Shoot, you're right about "accidental". Missed that in proofing. Same (maybe) with "broken", later on...
What's up with all the oxymorons? "Ardent, accidental"? "Deft, deliberate"?
I tried to make this section all about collision. It's describing geology, and political turmoil, the plight of refugees, and revolt, and brokenness and destruction. These oxymorons are meant to collide; to make noise; to jar the reader.
More than that, the "drunken, deft, deliberate" thing is my attempt to draw contrast between differing points of view. With many drunks (the "I drive better when I'm drunk" types, or the ones who try desperately to act sober as they get drunk), their drunken actions do become more deliberate-- to a point where they're almost a mock-up of themselves. They think they're bein' all smooth an' ****, but to sober people, they look like idiots. So there you have it-- it's all about POV.
BTW, Drink and drunkenness is a recurring theme in _Legend_ (not that you'd know that, having only this chapter). The "sand" is a geology ref., as I explained to XC.
"Tempest-tossed"-- it's from the poem at the base of the Statue of Liberty (I sang it in school. It's one of those propagandist rituals we do here in America...). Here's the poem (can't remember who wrote it, but you can Google it if you'd like):
"Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to be free;
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore--
Send these, the homeless tempest-tossed to me,
I lift my lamp beside the Golden Door."
(That's the thing about America-- the dream is SO beautiful, but the reality is often SO ugly...)
The reason I picked that phrase and referenced this poem should be obvious.
At the same time, this section is largely about sound-- about making music out of phrases whose images are jarring and whose meanings are often contradictory. Hence, all the alliteration. This is b/c the section falls amid other sections that are narrated by a wandering bard; a kid who hears music and sees beauty even in ugly, dissonant things. (Once again-- you wouldn't know this. My fault.)
What's up with the commas and semi-colons?
What's up is I don't know how to use them properly. I have never been sure where to use which. Once again, it's all about sound and rhythm to me. So a semi-colon is just a comma with a longer pause. If I thought I needed a long, non-broken (i.e. non-period) pause, I used a semi-colon. If I thought I needed a short pause, I used a comma.
So, BLP-- is there a standard for this sort of punctuation, and if so, where do I find it? (Not saying I'll use it, necessarily. In some places a comma just sounds too short to me, and I can't deal with that. I may get hammered for misusing convention, but it's my choice.)
(And yes, that's me pulling a "TheDave".)
There are a couple of your edits I didn't address... but I'll take a good, hard look at them before I submit this thing. And, please, if you could, reconsider your "not the sort of thing I usually read" position. Even where I might have chosen not to incorporate them, I liked your comments. They were insightful and on point. And even if you don't edit any more of the piece, I'd be honored if you read it!
OK, enough grovelling.
Quote:
Originally Posted by blp
...might manage few points - with the hands on sub-editing approach I favour.
****in' Brits!
Look-- you don't need the "u", so why put it in? Y'know, it's precisely these sorts of inefficiencies that lost you your Empire!
K. Rant over. Thanks, again, for your comments.
Anal about my colons. And bloody [I]periods[/I]! Don't even get me started!
Quote:
Originally Posted by blp
If I am elected, I promise to hold a referendum on Europe even if no one wants one; build dedicated cycle lanes on all, and I do mean all, London Streets, no matter how big or how small; wear my trousers inside out regardless of the fact that it will make most of you think I'm crazy. But any good grammar book should be able to sort this out for you better than I can.
Funny, BLP-- I think you're actually misusing semicolons here. The reason I think this is that the clauses that begin with "build dedicated cycle lanes..." and "wear my trousers inside out..." would not stand as complete sentences. As I understand S&W, that's the test-- you can use a semicolon instead of a period (in order to make your prose less choppy) if (and only if) each clause could stand as a complete sentence, were you to have a period in place of the semicolon.
Gawd, that's awkward. Well, I have more important editing to do, so it will have to stand...