Literature Network » Oliver Wendell Holmes

Ripples From Two Court Choices

Content courtesy of

From: The Washington Post
Date: 20060604
Author:George F. Will

In 1892, when First Amendment jurisprudence was in its infancy, Oliver Wendell Holmes, then a justice on the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, said that a policeman "may have a constitutional right to talk politics, but he has no constitutional right to be a policeman." Holmes had a flair for aphorisms, the clarity of which sometimes gave them excessive sweep. What he meant in the case of a policeman fired for collecting money for a political committee was that government has a right, for reasons of efficiency, to discipline an officer for speech that, had it been made by a private ...

Read the rest of this article with a Free Trial at HighBeam Research.

Other Articles on Oliver Wendell Holmes

About Our Articles: We've partnered with Highbeam Research to provide these article excerpts for your research needs. However, due to copyright laws, we cannot publish the whole article. To view these articles in full length you'll need to use the link above to access the free trial at Highbeam.