See that was my problem. I couldn't appreciate these moments as fully as you as i just didn't feel involved in the story at all. Similar to someone on here mentioning that they couldn't get into The Trial, whereas i couldn't get out of it! Glad to see that some of you felt so strongly about the novel though - will inspire me to re-read at some point in my life. Could be that the time/place/context for the reader (me) was as important here in responding to the novel as the content of the novel itself. I could read this again when i'm 70 and think it the greatest work of art i've ever encountered. I'm sure The Catcher in The Rye, The Stranger, Nausea, Amerika wouldn't have the same effect on me now as when i first read them at 17. That said, i should've mentioned this novel in the 'boring' rather than 'pointless' thread really. Still can't think of a pointless one.
Ooh! I can! Stephen Laws - Daemonic. Just awful. Abandoned after about 80 pages when i was aged 15. I didn't read again for 2 years.![]()



Reply With Quote