Books that I resent

[PeterL]

Recently, I saw a copy of The Quincunx by Charles Palliser in a used book store. I red that last year at the request of a friend who wanted a second opinion on the book. I finished it, and I consider the time it took to read it time that was wasted. While on a sentence-by-sentence level the book was fine, as a whole it was void. The the characters were thin, and the plot was absurd. Unfortunately, there are a large number of books published that have nothing to them, like the proverbial Chinese that leaves you hungry as soon as you finish.

Do others have this problem with some books, and which are they?

[spookymulder93]

That's why I like novels that are like 100-200 pages. They cut out the crap and leave nothing but action.

[dafydd manton]

If you want to feel that you have wasted a vast chunk of your life that you're not going to get back, any Harry Potter book ought to do it!

[Mr.lucifer]

My teacher fulnked the planet, I'm willing accept books that address the flaws of humanity as long as they're not insulting as this. Wnat me to elaborate further?

[Dark Muse]

Though it does take a lot to get me to quick a book I started, I usually do stop reading them before getting to the point of feeling resentful for having read them.

I have to say I did find Of Mice and Men a bit resentful! I had to read it for school, and I personally am not a huge fan of Steinbeck's writing style, and I really did not enjoy that book, and did not like having to read it, and I am not one of those people who just don't like assigned reading, most the stuff I read for school I enjoyed but I personally did not feel as if it were necessary to have an entire chapter just talking about scenery.

Also I did find All the Kings Men pretty god awful boring, after reading the book, I understood why I didn't enjoy the movie, because the book was not much of an improvement. One of the only reasons why I didn't give up on that one, was because I was reading it for a group read so I made myself stick to it, but it became a chore picking it up everyday to read, and I didn't feel like it was worth it by the end.

[_Shannon_]

Two books which I hated and loathed with all of my being? Wise Blood and Love In The Ruins.

Recently I read The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo(as a compromise to get a book club going)--and would have loathed it if it had taken more than the two days it took to read. As it was, it wasn't a huge investment--it just wasn't very good---and the payoff is now I have a bunch of people reading great books they wouldn't have otherwise read--Dumas and Dostoevsky and Tracy Kidder...

I also really didn't like Love In The Time of Cholera--but it wasn't the same level of loathing as I had for those first two books, one of which (Walker Percy)I threw against the wall while reading-not once, but twice.

[Joreads]

Recently I read The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo(as a compromise to get a book club going)--and would have loathed it if it had taken more than the two days it took to read. As it was, it wasn't a huge investment--it just wasn't very good---and the payoff is now I have a bunch of people reading great books they wouldn't have otherwise read--Dumas and Dostoevsky and Tracy Kidder...

Oh there you go my bookclub is reading that this month (I am in the middle of exams so i am not reading it.) as a compromise I went and saw the movie. I know that you can not compare movies and books but if the movie was anything to go by I can imagine what the book was like and I have no intention of ever picking it up. The violence which seemed to me just for the sake of it was enough to turn my stomach.

[spookymulder93]

Though it does take a lot to get me to quick a book I started, I usually do stop reading them before getting to the point of feeling resentful for having read them.

I have to say I did find Of Mice and Men a bit resentful! I had to read it for school, and I personally am not a huge fan of Steinbeck's writing style, and I really did not enjoy that book, and did not like having to read it, and I am not one of those people who just don't like assigned reading, most the stuff I read for school I enjoyed but I personally did not feel as if it were necessary to have an entire chapter just talking about scenery.

Also I did find All the Kings Men pretty god awful boring, after reading the book, I understood why I didn't enjoy the movie, because the book was not much of an improvement. One of the only reasons why I didn't give up on that one, was because I was reading it for a group read so I made myself stick to it, but it became a chore picking it up everyday to read, and I didn't feel like it was worth it by the end.

I loved that book. It was short and too the point with a good story. Sucks he had to get put down.

[prendrelemick]

Book clubs always involve a compromise. Mark Haddon's "A Spot of Bother" for example, was a waste of my time and effort, but some in my club enjoyed it.

I do resent reading a poor book, knowing there are loads of good ones out there. When I was younger I didn't mind so much, but now I'm old and crochety.

[mal4mac]

Mark Haddon's "A Spot of Bother" for example, was a waste of my time and effort, but some in my club enjoyed it.

That's the worst book I've tried to read in the last five years, if not ever. The literary equivalent of watching the England football team at this world cup.

[sixsmith]

Resentment might be overstating it, but Ian McEwan's Saturday is a novel that exhausts negative superlatives.

[kelby_lake]

To Kill A Mockingbird. Yeah, fine to study when you're about 11 but when you're 15...you kind of want to study adult books.

And On Chesil Beach was dreadful. How they're going to make a film of it, I don't know.

[PeterL]

That's why I like novels that are like 100-200 pages. They cut out the crap and leave nothing but action.

The would work well, if there were many 100 to 200 pages books, but hardly anything gets published that is less than 60,000 words, or about 325 pages. It isn't just a matter of the size as much it's the mater of a bad plot and bad characters.

[PeterL]

Though it does take a lot to get me to quick a book I started, I usually do stop reading them before getting to the point of feeling resentful for having read them.

I usually stop after a few pages, if it's really bad, but sometimes it doesn't become clear soon enough.

I have to say I did find Of Mice and Men a bit resentful! I had to read it for school, and I personally am not a huge fan of Steinbeck's writing style, and I really did not enjoy that book, and did not like having to read it, and I am not one of those people who just don't like assigned reading, most the stuff I read for school I enjoyed but I personally did not feel as if it were necessary to have an entire chapter just talking about scenery.

Those overly long descriptions really take the pleasure out of reading.

[PeterL]

Two books which I hated and loathed with all of my being? Wise Blood and Love In The Ruins.

Recently I read The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo(as a compromise to get a book club going)--and would have loathed it if it had taken more than the two days it took to read. As it was, it wasn't a huge investment--it just wasn't very good---and the payoff is now I have a bunch of people reading great books they wouldn't have otherwise read--Dumas and Dostoevsky and Tracy Kidder...

I also really didn't like Love In The Time of Cholera--but it wasn't the same level of loathing as I had for those first two books, one of which (Walker Percy)I threw against the wall while reading-not once, but twice.

I haven't read those, but Wise Blood appears to be pretty dull.