Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: mediocre book

  1. #1
    Unregistered
    Guest

    No Subject

    This was not written in the "Puritan times." It was written in the 19th cent. ABOUT the "Puritan times." To say you fully understand it is more than any scholar could even say.

  2. #2
    Andrea
    Guest

    mediocre book

    This book was mediocre. I just finished reading it during my freshman year in high school. And I am 14 years old and I completely understand this book. I do think that this is a classic even though it can be boring at times. But, what you must think is what makes a book a classic; it depends on the author. Nathaniel Hawthorne is a great story teller because somehow he gets his views out to the world, one way or another. He wrote this book during the Puritan times. It was very hard for people to say what they think during those days. But, today's literature is easier for people to understand. If you criticize this book I suggest you first read it completely and do a little research on Nathaniel Hawthorne. After you have done that CRITICIZE AWAY!

Similar Threads

  1. Movie is nothing compared to book
    By Dani in forum The Last of the Mohicans
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 02-11-2023, 10:11 AM
  2. Good book
    By Maria in forum The Prince and the Pauper
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 02-23-2014, 06:22 AM
  3. Great book
    By Big-Dan-T in forum The Jungle
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-04-2006, 06:03 PM
  4. Albert Goldbarth: "Library" part 1
    By amuse in forum Poems, Poets, and Poetry
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-05-2004, 07:28 PM
  5. Albert Goldbarth: "Library" part 2
    By amuse in forum Poems, Poets, and Poetry
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-05-2004, 07:27 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •