Maybe we are just talking in circles. Let me try to clarify.
Here is what I thought you were/are trying to say:
You can't remove the song lyrics from the music itself.
Reason 1. When you read the song lyrics without the music, they aren't at all like Shakespeare.
Reason 2. This song by the Clash is pretty lame without the music.
Reason 3. This song by the Rolling Stones is pretty lame without the music.
Reason 4. This song by Metallica rocks when you consider the guitar part.
Sub-point: the reason song lyrics are repetitive is usually because the music behind it is repetitive
My previous post was mainly about the sub-point concerning repetition. I guess I probably made too much of the word "because". I agree that repetition in songs often follow a form (as does repetition in poems). I thought you were trying to say that the repetition in the lyrics is merely an artifact of the music. Now I'm not sure what you were trying to say. To say that the lyrics often repeat according to a structure seems tautological to me. Maybe you were just musing and I mistook it as some point you were trying to get across.
I also tried to touch on the point that "you can't remove the song lyrics from the music itself". If all you meant was that there are some songs that are lame when the lyrics are considered apart from the music, I fully agree. I don't agree that this is true of songs in general.
I do agree that most lyrics do not read like Shakespearean poems. In fact, I would agree that even the best song lyrics do not give the same kind of enjoyment as Shakespeare (usually). I don't see why this means you can't remove the song lyrics from the music, though. Song lyrics, even apart from the music, often provide a different kind of enjoyment. If this is all you meant , I agree, but I dislike the use of the word 'depth' to describe the difference. Song lyrics are not as 'deep' as Shakespeare only in the sense that Ovid is not as 'deep' as Virgil.
As for there being examples of song lyrics that aren't compelling without the music (like Hot Stuff) and examples of songs where music adds a lot to the lyrics (like Ride the Lightning), I don't see what their existence is meant to imply about the quality of other song lyrics. I think there are many examples of songs whose lyrics are very rewarding to read. I already mentioned Eleanor Rigby, which I think achieves a great amount of emotional resonance with a very brief narrative. Not even Coleridge and Wordsworth's lyrical ballads are as efficient. I think the lyrics of Stairway to Heaven are very well-written, as well. The metrical structure of that song is quite rich, and reminds me of ancient Greek lyrics, like the choruses of the tragedies. I have come across few contemporary non-song poems as effective in their rhythmic structures, and this kind of complexity isn't typical of Shakespeare. There are also great examples from musical theater, like the one Modest Proposal posted above.
It's probable that I simply missed something entirely about what you are trying to say.However, I think lyrics can be meaningful. I'm certainly not calling them meaningless and vapid. I thought the U2 lyrics that I posted were meaningful.
I love it.![]()



Reply With Quote

