Why JCamilo? The reason you take my liking it for granted?Originally Posted by JCamilo
Why JCamilo? The reason you take my liking it for granted?
“Those who seek to satisfy the mind of man by hampering it with ceremonies and music and affecting charity and devotion have lost their original nature””
“If water derives lucidity from stillness, how much more the faculties of the mind! The mind of the sage, being in repose, becomes the mirror of the universe, the speculum of all creation.
Because the style of the threads you like to open.
Why didn't I vote it a nightmare? I think I thought it could be some kind of gateway for teenagers... but objectively, it is really just a nightmare. I remember I asked at a gas station in a foreign country where I could find a second hans bookstore to sell that book, and the guy seeing it said: Oh! I loved that book! (and then with some pride in his eyes) He's a portugese author. I just nodded, couldn't think of anything nice to say at that point. Good thing that store was close enough, and that the book was given to me, I managed to buy half a good book with it, which is more than it's worth anyway.
Et l'unique cordeau des trompettes marines
Apollinaire, Le chantre
I'm so glad I'm not alone in disliking this book (is hate too strong a word...? Maybe not!). I didn't like a single thing about it, apart from the fact it was quite a short story. Imagine if it was longer! It doesn't bear thinking about!!
Currently reading: Jane Eyre by Charlotte Bronte
http://www.projectreadmore.wordpress.com/
http://www.bookmooch.com
I've read The Alchemist and Veronika Decides to Die and found both to be mediocre. At least VDtD was a bit more entertaining even though it was equally cliche. The Alchemist just bored me to tears and it was incredibly pretentious, I really can't understand the popularity of this work. It's all Bill Clinton's fault.
I've read a couple of his books on the reccomendation of my daughter. I found them ok but not great. She liked them, she liked the situations and the dilemmas he forged- although thought that his resolution was often too simplistic.
The "revelations" of life and spirituality he shows us are really only common sense and are generally a bit of a let down. There seems to me to be no substance in his message.
@prendrelemick : I feel the same way about this book! Furthermore, it left a bad aftertaste -really- I had to stuff the goddamn book in a very dark corner of my conscience.
Be nice & spell our last name right at least! Kidding...no relation (it is a fairly common Portuguese last name, of the Johnson or Anderson variety). I love your hommage to Twin Peaks in the signature by the way! I just finished re-watching season 2 on dvd w/ my wife...David Lynch's quirky characters, coupled w/ his demonic small town undercarriage, is one of my favorite combinations on screen. Good to see Laura Palmer gettin' a little love here!I hated the book
On second thoughts i have read at least 4 Coehlo books and i didn't like any of them
http://unidentifiedappellation.blogspot.com/
didn't like it at all
This is the small-mindedness of you. Of course you may take a liking to something and I to another for interests and likings are diverse and taking everyone into the mold of something you like is bigotry for there are diverse and different interests and you must not be critical about others interests. I is totally personal and such narrow attitudes keep you distant from the rest. This world is too big and someone out there may take interest in all that you abhor
“Those who seek to satisfy the mind of man by hampering it with ceremonies and music and affecting charity and devotion have lost their original nature””
“If water derives lucidity from stillness, how much more the faculties of the mind! The mind of the sage, being in repose, becomes the mirror of the universe, the speculum of all creation.
I don't want to say any certainties, just wondering aloud here. Sometimes I think like you and say "well, it's okay if people like what i think is the awfulest trash, because i'm not anyone to say what's good". But then again, sometimes, like now, feel that TASTE has a limit. Beyond that limit, that may be a very blurred line, you can't continue talking about art.
I take for granted that all of us love literature. And i would like to think that all of us aim for the better understanding and beauty-gathering of complex works. That is what makes a good piece of art: complexity.
I believe that taste is trained. And that there is some kind of objective quality in any given book. And our task, as taste trainees, is to feel with our subjectivity that objective quality of what we read, and ever increase our demands.
Alejandro Dolina, an argentinian musician and writer, once said something about music that can be applied to all arts. ART is between offense and boredom. When a work is too simple, our minds or souls feel offended; an offense to our intelligence. When a work is by far too complex, it risks entering into total chaos, and when we can't make any single pattern or harmony we are bored and leave it. ART then lies in between. Some works are closer to one extreme, some to the other.
This idea echoes Aristotle's. ART is in the right medium between Apollo and Dyonisos, between RATIONALITY and PASSION. Too rational, we don't feel anything; too passional, no complex form.
Note that the MESSAGE is something that is not talked about in good art. Art must raise questions, not give answers. Quoting Todorov, Truth must be the horizon, not the starting point. When an author comes with his hands full of answers, i doubt he is an artist. But note also that this horizon is at the never reached end of an asymptote curve. "the imminence of a revelation, that doesn't come is, maybe, the esthetic event" -Jorge Luis Borges, The Wall and the Books (in my silly translation)
Personally I haven't read Coelho, but from what i've gathered from people whose knowledge of art i trust and admire, it seems to me that his works' rationality and craft is far too simple. And as regards passion, i get the image that he doesn't even gets close to the true and more complex human passions, he just skims the surface paraphrasing different religions. And also it seems he's got the answers, which I seriously doubt.
And here endeth my wond'rings. I think that i got carried away. Sorry.
Last edited by King Mob; 01-27-2010 at 01:03 AM.
All aboard. All souls at half-mast. Aye-Aye. -Samuel Beckett, More Pricks Than Kicks
The problem is that I did not criticized his for liking it. I said I expect he to like it because his preference of themes. If he thinks that is offensive (there is not judgment of vallue there. It is similar to say that someone who likes Richard Dawkins will post a lot about in discussion related to the creationism x evolution threads, etc) is because he is the one making vallue judgments of what his liking means.
Review on :
Alchemist for Paulo Coelho
It is said that his books have touched the hearts of people everywhere, and so it is !!
The Alchemist , one of the most inspiring books ever . A book that teaches you how to cling on your dreams , on what you believe in , until you make it true. It simple says " Don't stop moving forward for nothing is impossible. "
The Alchemist , is written by the great Brazilian writer Paulo Coelho . It is a story of a young shepherd named Santiago that dreams one day about finding a treasure in the Egypt's Pyramids . He meets and old king which shows him the way towards his treasure and tells him how he should follow his Personal Legend and to not be afraid of what days behold for him . The young boy knew nothing best than his flock and now he had to give them away, all that he built and worked for all these years ; thus , start a mysterious journey to nowhere but a dream .
Therefore, he did ! , he sold his sheep, travelled to Africa and started his journey . In pursuing his dream he goes through many incidents from being robbed by a thief in Tangier , working in a crystal shop and meeting the Alchemist but most of all he meets his love, Fatima in the mid of the desert.
This book is a must- read and you will come to know that if you do not follow and find you Personal Legend in you life ; you are probably living aimlessly . People are always afraid of changing but it is the change, the step, which means a lot in your life.
It's a book about hope , dreams , faith and most of all courage to pursue your path.
It teaches us how to trust our hearts and that when we move towards our dreams the world always wants us to find it and helps us to make it come true.
Regards ,
Hoope
"He is asleep. Though his mettle was sorely tried,
He lived, and when he lost his angel, died.
It happened calmly, on its own,
The way the night comes when day is done."
I agree to some point on how great books should be measure.. but you can't deny that the subject of the books plays a great role in attracting readers regardless on how it was written !
And the number of the readers is also a measuring scale .
"He is asleep. Though his mettle was sorely tried,
He lived, and when he lost his angel, died.
It happened calmly, on its own,
The way the night comes when day is done."
This book was just mind-numbingly bad. Even the main character is poorly developed and has no personality. The rest of the characters are worse. His descriptions are bland. I realize that the book is intended to be simplistic in nature, which is fine, but it was so poorly executed that the book just turned out boring and cliche.
Apparently all it takes to sell millions of copies of a book these days is to say, "Follow your heart, and all your dreams will come true", over and over with no substance in between. Maybe I should become an author...
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
