I ploughed through a large [500+ page] biography of Satre only last year. One of the things that decided me to read it was the thought that at least I'd understand what existentialism was by the end of it, but I was thwarted as both Satre and Camus denied the label and refused to have anything to do with any existentialist movement in their lives.
I found all this denial abit confusing, but at least thanks to DanielBenoit's post I now understand how we define a work as existential![]()


Reply With Quote


