Are some of Shakespeare's characters homosexual?

[LitNetIsGreat]

We have to remember that the concept of someone being a homosexual as we conceive of it today did not exist in Shakespeare's time. I agree that homoeroticism is present in a lot of his work, but we just have to be careful not to misinterpret actions from our modern western gender perspective. Effeminacy could be used to imply character flaws that were associated with women.

This is true and needs to be remembered. The "homosexual" was invented in the late 1800s and did not exist as an identity in the same way it does today. Before this time (in the western context at least) it was seen as a deviation and a crime, but it did not form part of the identity of the person. A person might commit "homosexual acts" but they were likely to be seen as one of deviations in the same way as someone might rob or commit fraud. Having said that there is nothing wrong with arguing a position that this or that character might have been "gay" as we see it today as long as we appreciate the difference of the context.

It often falls into the director's choice. I've seen Hamlet/Horatio (actually works), Iago/Othello (don't really buy into that), Hal/Falstaff (doesn't work), Antonio/Bassanio (justified)... the list goes on.

I think that homosexual overtones are much more overt in Marlowe's works... particularly in Edward II, but also in Faustus to a strong degree.

Yes I would say that Edward II is extremely overt to put it mildly.

[Mrig]

how does it matter?

[LitNetIsGreat]

how does it matter?

How does what matter? That somebody is or isn't homosexual?

Of course it doesn't matter on a practical level, nobody here is suggesting it does I think, but as people who are interested in literature, in character and motivation, then it might well do.

Observing what is not said in the text can be as interesting (or more interesting) than what is said. Besides, there is a whole branch of theory, Queer Theory or Lesbian Theory the followers of which are very interested in such questions indeed.

[kelby_lake]

how does it matter?

It's just interesting

[Dori]

how does it matter?

Also, if anyone's concerned with motives, such as those of Iago, one might ask such a question.

[kelby_lake]

Also, if anyone's concerned with motives, such as those of Iago, one might ask such a question.

Indeed. It would certainly change the perception of him.

[Dinkleberry2010]

The answer to the original question is no.

[Dori]

The answer to the original question is no.

Elaborate.

[kelby_lake]

Elaborate.

Yep. Shakespeare wasn't entirely ignorant of the fact that men would be playing all of the parts-hence a lot of cross-dressing and innuendo. You've got a lot of gender-playing in the sonnets too, especially sonnet 20.

What do you think of the fact that the majority of his sonnets are to a man?

[lawpaul58]

it should be emphasized again that we are in the 21st century with a different intepretation of masculine love from the Elizabethan age. The Shakespeare Plays are essentially rewrites of earlier Plays with the tragedy drama and characters added by the Shakespeare collaboration. remember also no females acting in any of the Plays and this was Shakes way of addressing the balance somewhat. Nobody can really suggest from what is known of William Shakespeare the actor from Stratford that he was ever gay, not fromthe likes of Field, Drayton, Burbage and Jonson who knew him as well as anyone, but we cannot say the same of Francis Bacon and to some extent, until his disappearance in 1593, Kit Marlowe. As many times as we re=read the Sonnets, nothing convinces me that Williams love for another William, the young William Herbert, was anything more than an older mans admiration (and envy) of a younger more handsome man who reminded him perhaps of who he was in his own adolescence.

[kelby_lake]

He does call him 'lovely boy' though, which is slightly creepy.

[Dorian Doyle]

I'd like to recommend Wilde's Portrait of W. H., it is about an interesting theory about the person to whom Shakespeare dedicates his sonnets. Although, I agree in what some people here has already said about the idea of homosexuality being not contemporary to Shakespeare.

[cacian]

Many of my friends have read shakespeare and have quoted on a lot of his characters being portrayed as gay. So I cannot rightly say if this is true or not as I don't read much shakespeare at all, but as Daniel says, does it really matter?

The only conclusion one can do draw from this is that Shakespear was gay himself why else would he involve himself with portraying gay characters?
charity begins at home they say.

[JCamilo]

Yes, i can see in 100 years people in Litnet of future arguing if Shakespeare was heterosexual and someone suggestion to the horror of other members that he was obviously heterosexual, otherwise why would he portrait heterosexual characters.