Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 27 of 27

Thread: Help for interpretation is needed

  1. #16
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    89
    Hi again Blacklilac - just wanted to drop you a quick thank you - I am going into town today to buy Finnegan's Wake - thanks to your post! Hope you are enjoying your course!

    Hi Mono - Yes, one of the nice things about the dense nature and breadth of reference of Joyce's prose is that it has something to offer everyone who likes to read it, and is open to all manner of interpretations, different for every reader, like poetry as you say.

    Hiya Brian, read your comments on Somerset Maugham, and agree with you - I do like his beautiful and intelligent prose, though I have read only a couple of his short stories, and the Moon and Sixpence. Of Human Bondage is coming with me to France in a few weeks as one of my holiday reads!

  2. #17
    Registered User Emil Miller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    London, England
    Posts
    6,499
    Quote Originally Posted by mollie View Post
    Hiya Brian, read your comments on Somerset Maugham, and agree with you - I do like his beautiful and intelligent prose, though I have read only a couple of his short stories, and the Moon and Sixpence. Of Human Bondage is coming with me to France in a few weeks as one of my holiday reads!
    Hi Mollie,

    I hope you enjoy France, I love it, but with Of Human Bondage at 1000 pp + you must be a fast reader or intending to stay over there for a long holiday.
    I would be interested in what you think of The Moon and sixpence as a story.

  3. #18
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    8,564
    Quote Originally Posted by mollie
    Hiya Brian, read your comments on Somerset Maugham, and agree with you - I do like his beautiful and intelligent prose, though I have read only a couple of his short stories, and the Moon and Sixpence. Of Human Bondage is coming with me to France in a few weeks as one of my holiday reads!
    Ah, one of my favorite novels of all time, mollie! Many times while reading Of Human Bondage the main character, Philip Carey, quite literally brought me to tears from time to time in his trials and tribulations. As I mentioned in another thread, I consider it one of the best novels of the 20th century, saturated with emotion, raw with expression, full of wit, and classically written. I have no doubt you will enjoy it!
    Quote Originally Posted by mollie
    I am going into town today to buy Finnegan's Wake
    Whew! Good luck, friend. It seems you already have shown a keen, instinctive understanding of the passage that started this thread, and I think you will have a sharper understanding of it than an average reader (like me). All of Joyce's works have a distinct challenge to them, unique in each work, but Exiles and The Dubliners read with a bit more ease. Let us know how it goes!

  4. #19
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    89

    Moon and Sixpence

    Hi Brian --

    I enjoyed the book and I like Maugham's storytelling style - straightforward, humorous, simple and elegant, plenty of his lovely ironic asides, and interesting subject matter.

    I know little of Gauguin's life and am not sure how much of the story was fictionalised, and how much was fact, but the part of the story that he placed in London and Paris flowed well, and his characterisation of Strickland was uncompromising and convincing. His characters are pleasingly flawed and human. However, I am not sure that the story was well served by the portion that takes place in Tahiti, and this part of the novel strikes me as somewhat contrived.

    Though he as narrator is a good and likeable companion to the reader, a couple of his observations on women, love and sexuality make me distinctly uncomfortable, and not in a good way. For example, he comments to Strickland's wife that her rage on her husband's leaving her to paint stems from her realisation that she can compete with another woman, but not with an idea. In other matters, he emphasises his youth and inexperience, and notes that he has since changed his mind or revised his opinion, but not in this case, which suggests that he still considers his observation legitimate, but it struck me as so wide of the mark that my faith in the rest of his observations takes a serious wobble.

    However, that is nitpicking. I did enjoy the book, and as I said, I like his writing style. Sorry, that turned into an essay!

    I'd be really interested to know what you thought of it yourself, if you have time?

    M

    PS - The holiday is indeed long, and I am a fast reader

    Hi Mono, looking forward all the more to Of Human Bondage after your and Brian's recommendation...I liked Dubliners and very much liked Ulysses, though not Portrait, so I am looking forward to Finnegan's Wake enormously. And I must say that you do not strike me as an "average" reader! Anyway, will let you know how I get on!

    M

  5. #20
    Registered User Emil Miller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    London, England
    Posts
    6,499
    [QUOTE=mollie;708906]Hi Brian --

    I enjoyed the book and I like Maugham's storytelling style - straightforward, humorous, simple and elegant, plenty of his lovely ironic asides, and interesting subject matter.

    I know little of Gauguin's life and am not sure how much of the story was fictionalised, and how much was fact, but the part of the story that he placed in London and Paris flowed well, and his characterisation of Strickland was uncompromising and convincing. His characters are pleasingly flawed and human. However, I am not sure that the story was well served by the portion that takes place in Tahiti, and this part of the novel strikes me as somewhat contrived.

    Though he as narrator is a good and likeable companion to the reader, a couple of his observations on women, love and sexuality make me distinctly uncomfortable, and not in a good way. For example, he comments to Strickland's wife that her rage on her husband's leaving her to paint stems from her realisation that she can compete with another woman, but not with an idea. In other matters, he emphasises his youth and inexperience, and notes that he has since changed his mind or revised his opinion, but not in this case, which suggests that he still considers his observation legitimate, but it struck me as so wide of the mark that my faith in the rest of his observations takes a serious wobble.

    However, that is nitpicking. I did enjoy the book, and as I said, I like his writing style. Sorry, that turned into an essay!

    I'd be really interested to know what you thought of it yourself, if you have time?

    M

    PS - The holiday is indeed long, and I am a fast reader

    Hi Mono, looking forward all the more to Of Human Bondage after your and Brian's recommendation...I liked Dubliners and very much liked Ulysses, though not Portrait, so I am looking forward to Finnegan's Wake enormously.
    And I must say that you do not strike me as an "average" reader! Anyway, will let you know how I get on!


    Thanks for your observations on The Moon and Sixpence Mollie. First I am glad you enjoyed Maugham's style of writing, it remained characteristic throughout his very long life. Although the stories cover a period dating from the turn of the 19th century to post WW11 his writing brilliantly portrayed the changing lifestyles occasioned by both world wars.
    For my part, I found the novel completely convincing in all repects but I could say the same about virtually anything written by Maugham

    As for Maugham himself, I have to say that he was not a nice person and as a homosexual his mariage to Syrie Barnardo was simply a mask required by the conventions of the day. He was cynical and although anybody who was anybody were invited to his villa in the south of France, it didn't pay to get on the wrong side of him. As the richest writer in the world during the 1930s, he was a force to be reckoned with in literary circles. I think that losing his mother as a child was the main factor responsible for his cynical attitude towards people in general and his homosexuality certainly coloured his attitude towards women. That is why the remark that you have mentioned is very much in line with his character.
    It is interesting that you found the Tahiti sections of the novel contrived, because it was while on a visit to the south seas, where he visited the grave of Robert Louis Stevenson on Samoa, that Maugham also visited the hut on Tahiti where Gauguin had died and bought a glass-pannelled door for 200 francs, from the then owner, covered with a painting by Gauguin; which he subsequently hung in his villa in France along with the other paintings in his considerable collection.
    .
    Whatever his imperfections as a person, he did have a sharp insight into human psychology and his books have given great pleasure to millions of people the world over throughout the years and continue to do so.
    I hope you enjoy Of Human Bondage which Mono aptly describes as a masterpiece.

  6. #21
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    89
    Hi Brian

    Thanks a mill for the info and insights into Maugham's character - it is always a pleasure when talking of books to listen to someone well informed and with a genuine passion for his subject.

    I did know from the biographical blurb on my edition and some searches online that Maugham had actually visited Tahiti - it is not his representation of the place and the people that he meets there that strikes me as contrived (the woman-beating references p'd me off, but the past is another country), and I find that I can't articulate or even place exactly why I found that part of the novel jarring. Strange...

    Yes, his acuteness of observation did strike me (which is why I found it so odd that his reaction Mrs S.'s rage was so off-key), along with his cynicism and occasional malice - they all feature strongly in his short story Louise, which has been a favourite of mine since I was at school, and as close to perfect as you can get. I clearly have terrible flaws in my character that I find him such good company as a narrator .

    Again, thanks for the information and insights - and for the Of Human Bondage recommendation - can't wait now! And once again, it was lovely to talk to you.

    M.

  7. #22
    I believe this is how he views success. "Here in moicane we flop on the seamy side...."-Here in moicane we do what we please. "...but up n'ent, prospector, you sprout all you're worth and you woof your wings..."-Up there you use material things to show your worth and you flant yourself and your things. "...if you want to be phoenixed, come and be parked."-He was advocating death as the solution to life's problems.

  8. #23
    Registered User maxphisher's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    97
    Okay, I'm working off the top of my head with that quote, but I can give you a little bit of insight into one deciphering/translation of the line. If I'm not mistaken, Moicane is the same as the "Nighttown" district of Dublin that Joyce depicts in the "Circe" episode of Ulysses. Think of the redlight district of any large metropolitan city. This explains the fact that its citizens "flop on the seamy" or disreputable "side." "Prospector" might point towards the act of seeking meaning, one of the main themes of Joyce's books, and wings are presumably symbolic of good or virtuousness. By seeing the flaws of those that live in the redlight district, one encounters both the symbolic fall of man and the possibility of virtuous rebirth and discovery. However, keep in mind that Phoenix is capitalized, so not only does it denote a rebirth image, rising from the ashes, but it also points to Phoenix Park on the west end of Dublin. This is the location where, in 1882, an Irish nationalist group murdered British dignitaries and escaped into the city in a getaway vehicle driven by James "Skin the Goat" Fitzharris. He parked the getaway car outside the park gates, if I am not mistaken, and waited for the murderers to finish their deed so he could drive them to safety.

    Now, how one might make sense of all that information is a bit more to chew. As I said, my simple reading off the top of my head leads me to believe that perhaps the lessons that can be learned in the seedy part of town are likely to enlighten you, but they come with the risk of either spiritual or physical death . . . Nonetheless, these are, again, the types of transformations that allow one to be reborn and to grow. Like I said, however, that's a 5-minute attempt at reading that line; there is definitely much more meaning buried in it. I can't even imagine that I've scraped the surface, but it will give you a decent starting place regarding how Joyce uses words to convey several meanings at once.

  9. #24
    "Here in Moicane we flop on the seamy side, but up n'ent, prospector, you sprout all your worth and you woof your wings, so if you want to be Phoenixed, come and be parked."

    Sounds like jibberish, but let me take a stab at it. A lot of the expressions in Finnegan's wake (and even Ulysses) resemble the "nonsense speech" of psychotics or drunks who say whatever come into their minds. It may be possible to make sense of this jibberish, but to do so you need to decipher what's going on in the speaker's mind.

    This is not an easy task. I've had a chance, through my work as a neurologist, to listen to the speech of plenty of psychotic and neurologically impaired patients. These folks often use language that makes little sense, though you can "see through" what they are saying to get at "what they mean." Often they use things like "rhyme" or "clanging" sounds, rather than "logical" associations, or what could probably be described as "subconscious" associations (e.g "stream of consciousness").

    I've no idea what this quoted statement means...let's look at it:

    "Here in Moicane we flop on the seamy side, but up n'ent, prospector, you sprout all your worth and you woof your wings, so if you want to be Phoenixed, come and be parked."

    In Moicane [wherever that is] we [and I mean regular down-to-earth folks like me, not highfalutin arrogant a-holes like you, Mr. Prospector] "flop on the seamy side" [which means we regular blokes get down and hang loose, doing what comes naturally in Moicane...wherever that is]...But you [because you are the highfalutin fellow you are] just fluff up your wings [to display your superiority]. You somehow want to rise out of this Moicane environment as a transcendent Phoenix, but you can't do that without getting low down and dirty.

  10. #25
    Registered User maxphisher's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    97
    Quote Originally Posted by Nick Capozzoli View Post
    Sounds like jibberish, but let me take a stab at it. A lot of the expressions in Finnegan's wake (and even Ulysses) resemble the "nonsense speech" of psychotics or drunks who say whatever come into their minds. It may be possible to make sense of this jibberish, but to do so you need to decipher what's going on in the speaker's mind.

    No offense, but this isn't necessarily true. While some of the language may seem to be gibberish and indicative of psychotic uninhibited speech, I assure you that Joyce's text is anything but. Almost every word stems from a highly structured and extremely conscious system of symbols and references. A surface level deciphering of the line can be attained through such an approach, but it doesn't really get to the fulls multi-level meanings that Joyce plants in the language.

    This is not an easy task. I've had a chance, through my work as a neurologist, to listen to the speech of plenty of psychotic and neurologically impaired patients. These folks often use language that makes little sense, though you can "see through" what they are saying to get at "what they mean." Often they use things like "rhyme" or "clanging" sounds, rather than "logical" associations, or what could probably be described as "subconscious" associations (e.g "stream of consciousness").

    I think that you're referring to onomatopoeia here. Much of the earliest languages, it is believed, consisted of words that sounded like actions or sound associations with actions. Since language, essentially, is arbitrary and unreliable, sound recognition served as a logical means of assigning word associations. Given Joyce's vast knowledge of languages, he could speak roughly 9 nine languages and was familiar with several dialects of some of them. Much of his text consists of plays on these languages, partial transcriptions between languages, and sound associations to words and ideas. On top of that, many of the words operate on several levels. In this case, for example, "Phoenix" serves at least two purposes: 1. the mythical bird that is a symbol of regeneration and rebirth 2. the public park in Dublin where nationalists murdered a British dignitary. While seemingly separate ideas, these two concepts can actually begin to overlap and mingle in regard to meaning. The murder in Phoenix Park brought about a public scandal that ruined, in the simplest terms, the career of Irish politician, Charles Stewart Parnell. Parnell symbolized, for many, the possible rebirth of the Irish state, and many, including Joyce's father and, subsequently, Stephen Dedalus's father, a real possibility for an Irish free state. When Parnell was disgraced, through an alleged association with the Phoenix Park murders and an adultry scandal, many believed that hope for the Irish state had been lost. However, the events that occurred as a result of the 1882 event, also the same year Joyce was born, spurred a resurgence of nationalist sentiment, which ultimately led to the 1916 Easter Rising and the consequent Irish Civil War.

    Also, in regard to "stream of consciousness" writing, it is not really tied to subconscious reaction. Stream of consciousness allows the reader insight into the formative mental responses and inspirations for the action and speech of the novel. A character can respond to or inspire narrative or action by mentally working through his/her mental responses to what is occurring or being said around him/her. These responses seem to be "gibberish" because we don't think as a linear narrative; we mentally respond to stimuli and, in turn, these response spur similar and sometimes seemingly arbitrary mental responses. Thus, we, as readers, only get a loose framework of rapid responses to what we see as a single stimulus. The rest of the responses are chained together by the extremely conscious reactions that the narrator has to the initial stimulus and his/her response=stimulus>response=stimulus>response=stumu lus>response, etc. "Stream of consciousness" cannot be subconscious thought, or it would be impossible to convey in text/narrative. The character has to be aware of the thoughts and connections that he/she is having/making, or they would not exist in the text that the reader is reading. And definitely don't make the assumption that Joyce was not "hyper-aware" of the connections he was putting into his text.

    I've no idea what this quoted statement means...let's look at it:

    "Here in Moicane we flop on the seamy side, but up n'ent, prospector, you sprout all your worth and you woof your wings, so if you want to be Phoenixed, come and be parked."

    In Moicane [wherever that is] we [and I mean regular down-to-earth folks like me, not highfalutin arrogant a-holes like you, Mr. Prospector] "flop on the seamy side" [which means we regular blokes get down and hang loose, doing what comes naturally in Moicane...wherever that is]...But you [because you are the highfalutin fellow you are] just fluff up your wings [to display your superiority]. You somehow want to rise out of this Moicane environment as a transcendent Phoenix, but you can't do that without getting low down and dirty.
    I've added some notes inside your deciphering. There were some spots where I worry that you might be skipping over keys to Joyce's meaning by taking the text at face value. That being said, I believe you've essentially hit on the basic meaning of the line. P.s. I'm definitely not trying to come across as judgmental or condescending; I just wanted to point out some holes in your approach that might help to uncover the deeper meanings of the line of text. Hope this helped.

  11. #26
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    3,123
    Short of beingJoyce one can but guess: "seamy" means grubby or dirty, usually sexually so. Phoenix is definitely a reference to Phoenix park as others have said and Moicane has been identified but n'ent seems to me to be a colloquialism that I can't quite fetch from my memory right now. Feel pretty sure he is punning "sprout" and " spout"”. There's a lot of love of the playful for the sake of the sound over the exact meaning or perhaps JJ would reckon the meaning was the sound. Joyce was no nationalist. He buggered off to Europe's greener and more pleasant lands.

  12. #27
    Johnny One Shot Basil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Hog Hammock
    Posts
    2,245
    Quote Originally Posted by mono View Post
    Secondly, setting all the varieties of languages aside, he intended readers to pronounce many passages aloud, and, with this, one would understand those passages, because, for example, two words would equal one, when cutting out frequently silent letters in English, it would sound like a word, rather than gibberish, and, in many of his other books, he would use onomatopoeia, for example, some may recall the first sentence of A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man...
    I miss Mono.
    __________________


    "If it is honorable for you to disturb the dead, I shall consider it an honor and will make it my ambition to disturb your living." - Captain Miles Hazzard

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •