Thanks, manolia!

I've made a shortlist of 96 films out of the
1001 films you must see before you die book. I'm skeptical about these things, but so far so good: I've already watched three of these: Hiroshima, Kane and 'A Trip to the Moon', 1902 (the whole of it:
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=ZI9OaZ...eature=related +
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=NjjTAu...eature=related). Starts slow, but great special effects in the second half, I was rather impressed! Couldn't bring myself to rate a film more than a hundred years old, I with my 21st century prejudices and all, but it's definitely a must see, everyone!
(by the way, manolia, I'm in love with your signature. 'Twin Peaks' is one of my favourite shows ever, you see

)
EDIT: Yeah, my sister actually hates these kind of lists, but I think it's a reliable guide of quality if you're looking forward to seeing good movies for a whole year. This book is good because one of its criterion is the film's legacy in other films and its impact on society too. That's why 'The Exorcist', for example, features in it, and even though I found it quite bad (I laughed my way through it) I can see why it's a landmark. Every movie comes with a short description, so I know if it's my cup o' tea.
(One such films should be 'David Holzman's Diary'. I'm desperately looking for it, looks like my sort of film, but can't find it anywhere...)
And yes, it depends on who says it's the best movie, because it's not like there's a universally accepted canon. I too have seen people herald Battleship as the king of films, that's why it's also on my list
