
Originally Posted by
JBI
It's a good book, and it deals with the war - just because it doesn't have a cliché romance or some blood and guts doesn't make it a bad book. That's the problem with these genre things - people only seem to be willing to vote for books they have heard about, and potentially already have read. Notice also the divide of books by nationality - 7 American, one English, one German, and one Canadian - clearly the expansion of viewpoints is being jeopardized, the same way a thriller that 3 people had already read won for January, whereas a unique book that many hadn't heard about, but had heard good things about was completely ignored.
If I were to talk about War Novels, I would think this one far more important to the genre, and the history of war literature than the others, simply because it is offering the perspective of someone who is truly marginalized by the war, and offering a perspective that goes against the image of the "noble victor" that seems to pollute the rest of these books (with the exception I believe of For Whom the Bell Tolls, and Master and Commander, which offer the good guys tragically losing, and with All Quiet on The Western Front, which begins to approach somewhat a notion of mature war narrative) but even so, where are the minorities caught up in these? Where are the other voices, of Women, of children, of those involved, of those reduced to a status less than human because of cultural bias, and in essence full fledged racism? One book, ironically. Yes, it most certainly is a war novel.
Either way though, I bet Hemmingway wins, he being the most well known of the list, I think.