I am posting this question because in “Romeo and Juliet” the person who sold the poison to Romeo tells him: “ My poverty, but not my will, consents to sell you the poison”. So we can conclude that if there was not poverty, Romeo wouldn’t have been able to get the poison, therefore he wouldn’t have killed himself. It seems that Shakespeare is sending the message that poverty is causing the tragedy.
I think that's over-reading it a bit. I agree that apothecarist is selling the poison because he is poor, but I am not sure the entire tragedy of their fate can be summed in poverty. Both Romeo and Juliet were both members of upper-class noble families; the tragedy really has its roots in the Ancient hatred between the two families.
"You understand well enough what slavery is, but freedom you have never experienced, so you do not know if it tastes sweet or bitter. If you ever did come to experience it, you would advise us to fight for it not with spears only, but with axes too." - Herodotus
https://consolationofreading.wordpress.com/ - my book blog!
Feed the Hungry!
I think that aspect just adds to the idea that Romeo and Juliet were just victims of ill fate.
Heaven knows we need never be ashamed of our tears, for they are rain upon the blinding dust of earth, overlying our hard hearts.
- Charles Dickens, Great Expectations
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote