Montaigne's Essays, The Maxims of La Rochefoucauld, and Plato's Republic are all on my top shelf with my favorite fiction. Thoreau's Walden is somewhat lower, but it was a book that changed my life many years ago. Gibbon's The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire is still sitting on my "to be read" shelf because it's very long and I haven't gotten around to finishing it. But yeah, it's the sweet spot.
What do I like about each of them. I suppose I liked the way Montaigne would synthesize information, the turn of his mind, and the friendly good humored nature of his voice. You felt a real warmth and intelligence communicated to you through the essays, in a way that you wouldn't get from another essay writer such as Bacon. La Rochefoucauld was a sharp observant customer, kind of like Bacon, but even more succinct. He manages to distill his argument and point of view down to a few well chosen words, and his sentences sparkle like diamonds. The only other book that impressed me in quiet the same way as Plato's Republic was Dante's Divine Comedy. Dante obviously modeled his structure on Plato, and you can see how one part builds methodically on top of the previous sections and each subsequent part incorporates all that's come before into itself. You start to see the ways Plato is developing meaning across a number of different levels, and then it hits you, this book is a road map for the last two thousand years of history. Then it's got this ending which is shear literary artistry. I started reading Gibbon because I have a thing for ancient societies and the Romans especially, but his sentence structure is unlike anything I've ever seen. It has this balance, and flow, and weight that's magnificent. I'd like to take it apart sometime and see how he does it. Thoreau I've already mentioned.


Reply With Quote

