Help! Virgil, I can't catch up.....I just posted another long post (that you can't read
do you need glasses, or something?) and now I see about 4 more posts. I never thought I could not keep up on here. This is great though...good posts!
I was thinking the same thing and posted it above. It is a recurring theme for Lawrence. Also, in the last story we did "Sun". That also took place on an island, didn't it? So quickly my memory fails me...![]()
That is interesting about the flower and the reference to the woman's name. I had not thought of that before. Also the island owner studied the flowers and plants assigning the Latin names to them. He did this on the first island only, I believe.For those that have participated before on these Lawrence stories, you may have heard me say that Lawrence's ideal heavenly life is that of a flower. A flower just lives, basks in the glory of godly sunlight, is completely in tune with nature, and, more important of all. has no will, that is a desire for things and an expresson of self, which Lawrence calls ego. A flower just is. That is the pre-lapsarian condition fro Lawrence, the condition before Adam and Eve lapsed in the Garden of Eden and had to then live in the physical world. What we see in this story is contrasts between flowers and humans and other mammals. Notice the woman he marries is named Flora. Notice that all the humans on the variuos islands express their will, and even the mammals do too. Notice that the sheep that he hates in that last island bleats and causes his irritation. That bleat is an expression of its will. Cathcart cannot find hapiness because real people have wills and express it. People expressing wills have conflicts with each other. At least that is the problem of the first two islands. On the third island the problem is his humanity in conflict with the overwhelming natural elements. He cannot escape his humanity because he is not in paradise, but in a lapsed state of flesh and blood humanity. I think that is why Lawrence also contrasts him with the ghosts and spirits. He is flesh and blood human and must survive in society and against the elements. The spirits have transcended humanity; Cathcart has not. At last not until he dies.
Also of interest to me is what you pointed out here about the 'will', even as far as the sheep exerting a will towards the man by their bleeting.
I like the way you described the three islands pointing out their shortcomings or problems, as perceived by the Master.
Finally, good observation and thought about the contrast of the man of 'flesh and blood' to that of the 'ghosts and spirits'. I think this relates back to that statement about asleep or awake. The ghosts also would be in a state of not being asleep or awake - or dead or alive. I think of Hamlet's famous speech and all the sleep references in Shakespeare where sleep represents or means death. Exactly, the man cannot achieve, even the transendence that the ghosts embody, until he is dead.
DM, thanks for that information on the Hesperides. Interesting that apples again are contained in this myth as in the Garden of Eden. Also the idea of forbidden fruit and the loss of a paradise.
Hira, glad all this is helping you to understand. There are so many ways to look at this story and see it. It has so many layers and so much symbolism and meaning. As we go along more will become 'unjumbled' for you and all of us. It is a lot to digest so review the posts and I think I, for one, will take a break soon. I am getting rather exhausted.Hira Wow, you all post such excellent posts! Wonderful ways to help see. Things start to unjumble. I haven't read or digested all of it at the moment though.
Good point about his own 'will'. I hope Virgil can add to this since you directed this question to him. Sorry I jumped in here.Virgil, didn't he achieve that state of desirelessness on the second island? But then Flora's will came in the way I suppose? And wasn't there his will on the third island too, his will to be alone and shun any other company?
Very significant. However, you have to understand that Lawrence wrote reams of letters - I think there are about 8 full volumes of them. I have "The Selected Letters" which does not include them all. I wish I had the time to read them all - they are fascinating.I was searching these letters of D.H.Lawrence, most of the parts are not available online I think and I don't have the book. I came across this in his letter to E.M.Forster
Quote:
"In my Island, I wanted people to come without class or money, sacrificing nothing, but each coming with all his desires, yet knowing that his life is but a tiny section of the Whole: so that he shall fulfill his life in relation to the whole. I wanted a real community, not built out of abstinence or equality, but out of many fulfilled individualities seeking greater fulfillment.
But I can’t find anybody. Each man is so bent on his own private fulfillment – either he wants the love of a woman, and can’t get it complete or he wants to influence his fellow men (for their good, of course), or he wants to satisfy his own soul with regard to his position in eternity. And they make me tired, these friends of mine. They seem so childish and greedy, always the immediate desire, always the particular outlook, no conception of the whole horizon wheeling around."
I wonder if thats relevant.
To understand also is the fact that Lawrence often wavered from his original ideas or concepts. He was never quite 100% sure of what he really wanted his utopia or community to be. He had ideas, as stated above, but as he also stated he could not find anyone to go along with them. There were a few who were interested and the closest he came was his ranch and home in New Mexico, but that soon soured on him, much like the man in the island story became dissatisfied. Things went wrong for Lawrence too, and he had to live realistically in the real world, not one of his making. This is why I said several posts back, this story may have been fashioned after this man Lawrence knew, who owned an island, but if the truth were known, it is more about Lawrence himself, in my own opinion.
DM, I read your post and I won't requote it. I agree with all you just said in your post. Thanks for answering mine. Good point also about the cat and the sheep and how these were like the world encrouching on the islander.
Whew, I think I caught up now!


I just posted another long post (that you can't read
do you need glasses, or something?) and now I see about 4 more posts. I never thought I could not keep up on here. This is great though...good posts!
"It's so mysterious, the land of tears."
Reply With Quote

