Art and science are not even comparable. I do not want to get into an argument about Truth here, and while I uphold that the sciences and mathematics are arbitrary, the fact is that they have testable, independantly verifiable values. Art does not. If a painting is mispainted it does not blow up a rocket, does not send a bridge crashing to the ground. The sciences are a non-zero sum game. If you screw up, you've lost, and you are therefore varifiably wrong. Art is not even close. Art isn't even a game. There is no result. And as far as there being no public opinion poll on law, I would refer you to the concept of a referendum which is exercised every two years in most places in the US. Sometimes you might go an election without one, but it's rare.
Plato also suggested we have a philospher king. Would you agree to such a tyranny? I never would. Even a philosopher king of art. After all, didn't the entire scope of modern art evolve from the necesity of breaking the dictatorship of artistic elitism? What was the cry of the Salon des Refuses in 1863? Didn't Manet, Cezanne, Whistler and Pisarro decry the dictation of the elite, the Academy, in marking the quality and veracity of art in accepting any who would submit? What would art be today if no one stood up to challenge the authority of 'legitimate' taste? What did Modigliani's entire life stand for if not an empahtic statement of the unacceptability of the dictation of taste? His empty eyes, his long necks? We have never had an academy in this country, not for language, art or les belles lettres, and we do not need it because we are a country where the aesthetic is not dictated to us, and nor should it be, because such dication necesarily means certain important movements and ideas will be left in the cold and progress prohibited. Art, as it exists as an idea, must necesarily be unfettered. Movements must be allowed to run their course without intervention, and if that is done, if rap is accepted for what it is we may find it passes faster than we expect. After all, it draws its very greatness from its illegitimacy, when, in fact, it is not. If it is the ideas of rap that we find distasteful it is those ideas that must be fought and not rap, which I gather you would agree with. Art is nothing more than ordered expression, a vessel within which almost anything can be contained.



Reply With Quote

interesting articles today on


Very much agreed. It disgusts me how these horribly sexist and prejudice messages are being delivered to young people. Teenagers already embody a strong id, no need to exacerbate it with graphic and crude popular culture.

) and just plain inappropriate and disgusting material. Look at the lyrics shadow posted. I could never believe the act of rape to have any positive connotations ever. Yet in hip hop it is sung by singers who are portrayed as "cool", giving it positive connotations and youth very wrong imnpressions. I think, no matter what context you have, rape and sexism to that extreme should be looked at as an immoral and wrong act.

