Buying through this banner helps support the forum!
Page 17 of 131 FirstFirst ... 712131415161718192021222767117 ... LastLast
Results 241 to 255 of 1952

Thread: Astronomy

  1. #241
    Maybe YesNo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    For Mill, South Carolina
    Posts
    9,530
    Blog Entries
    2
    I would think that a nova would destroy any planets with life in nearby solar systems. I wonder if binary star systems are needed for these novas to occur.

  2. #242
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    A rural part of Sweden, southern Norrland
    Posts
    3,123
    The Lunar Reconnaissance orbiter is another of those quiet missions that rarely gets a mention on the news. This post on earthsky said that the orbiter has gone into a very low orbit (12 miles above the surface) to explore and map the dark side of the moon.I will work at this height for some time:
    "Team members made the decision to change the orbit after determining that the new orbit configuration poses no danger to the spacecraft. They say LRO can operate for many years at this orbit."

  3. #243
    Registered User Iain Sparrow's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    xxxxx
    Posts
    548
    Quote Originally Posted by YesNo View Post
    I would think that a nova would destroy any planets with life in nearby solar systems. I wonder if binary star systems are needed for these novas to occur.
    Yes indeed, a nova would exterminate all organic life in that solar system.
    If memory serves, supernovas occur more often in binary systems, only because the needed mass threshold is more likely with two stars; one star pulling material away from the other. But solitary stars explode too, if large enough.

  4. #244
    Registered User Iain Sparrow's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    xxxxx
    Posts
    548
    Quote Originally Posted by Dreamwoven View Post
    The Lunar Reconnaissance orbiter is another of those quiet missions that rarely gets a mention on the news. This post on earthsky said that the orbiter has gone into a very low orbit (12 miles above the surface) to explore and map the dark side of the moon.I will work at this height for some time:
    "Team members made the decision to change the orbit after determining that the new orbit configuration poses no danger to the spacecraft. They say LRO can operate for many years at this orbit."

    I think the problem is that mapping the dark side of the Moon, just isn't 'sexy' enough for the nightly news.

  5. #245
    Maybe YesNo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    For Mill, South Carolina
    Posts
    9,530
    Blog Entries
    2
    I was also looking for more information about Ceres, but I couldn't find anything new. Yes, the dark side of the moon isn't as sexy as those bright spots on Ceres.

  6. #246
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    A rural part of Sweden, southern Norrland
    Posts
    3,123
    I've continued each day to check the NASA Dawn website, too. Nothing so far. I think that, like the moon orbiter, it may be able to make out more detail once its orbit is low enough. Obviously, orbiting such a small planet it will take time to get into the lowest orbit.

  7. #247
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    A rural part of Sweden, southern Norrland
    Posts
    3,123
    You may be right, Iain, the moon is not attractive enough for a news bulletin. I think the moon orbiter is looking for frozen water, hence the south pole of the moon.

  8. #248
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    A rural part of Sweden, southern Norrland
    Posts
    3,123
    4-inch cubesats for exploring deep space.

  9. #249
    Maybe YesNo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    For Mill, South Carolina
    Posts
    9,530
    Blog Entries
    2
    Here is a new picture of Ceres. It looks like the larger reflective surfaces are composed of smaller ones: http://www.nbcnews.com/science/space...planet-n357161

  10. #250
    Maybe YesNo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    For Mill, South Carolina
    Posts
    9,530
    Blog Entries
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by Dreamwoven View Post
    4-inch cubesats for exploring deep space.
    Just when I thought bigger was better, it looks like small has advantages as well.

  11. #251
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    A rural part of Sweden, southern Norrland
    Posts
    3,123
    Mammutus clouds from EarthSky

  12. #252
    Maybe YesNo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    For Mill, South Carolina
    Posts
    9,530
    Blog Entries
    2
    They look like cotton balls in the sky.

  13. #253
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    A rural part of Sweden, southern Norrland
    Posts
    3,123
    It seems that the distinction between asteroids and comets in the asteroid belt might be becoming blurred: http://astronomynow.com/2014/11/11/a...velops-a-tail/

  14. #254
    Maybe YesNo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    For Mill, South Carolina
    Posts
    9,530
    Blog Entries
    2
    The more information one gets the more original categories break down. Ceres could even be a dwarf planet.

  15. #255
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    A rural part of Sweden, southern Norrland
    Posts
    3,123
    There is a wikipedia page on him. He does look interesting. This one on music of the spheres is a blog devoted to the subject.

Similar Threads

  1. poetry and astronomy
    By andave_ya in forum Poems, Poets, and Poetry
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 11-09-2014, 06:20 AM
  2. Astronomy Question
    By LeavesOfGrass in forum General Chat
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 02-18-2010, 05:41 AM
  3. The King Who İs İnterested İn Astronomy
    By Zagor26 in forum Short Story Sharing
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-07-2007, 10:14 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •