Firstly, you analogy is inapt. In the first case, the customer is asking the businessman to sell what they don't sell. That's not what Gay customers expecting the same service from a business as everyone else are doing. In the second case, you're talking about forcing someone to do an activity they wouldn't normally do. That's not what Gay customers expecting the same service from a business as everyone else are doing either. They are asking the businessman to do what they do every day in their business. So, it is not a matter of the Gay customer forcing the businessman to do something s/he doesn't usually do. It is a matter of the businessman choosing to break the law of their governmentally-issued business license and defy the constitution.
So, I will speak plainly here. The constitution, particularly the Equal Protection Clause, prohibits any business owner from discriminating against anyone for who they are. Using your logic, White business owners should be able to discriminate against Black customers because they want to do so. Like discrimination against Gays, that is abhorrent...and I'm stunned a Christian like you supports it. So, there is no debate here, an American's constitutional right to not be discriminated against trumps a business owner's desire to illegally discriminate. So, Gays have no reason to have to hope somebody will serve them when the Constitution says they don't have to do so.
So, that's the Constitutional, and ethical, reality of the issue. So, even though (for some reason) that bothers you, you need to get used to it. The Constitution won't be changing soon.
As to your question, I don't know of which people you speak. I've never encountered any one who has expressed such determination.



Reply With Quote
