Really just depends on the face.Originally Posted by Clopin
Can you easily define an art object?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...hy#Art_objects
Really just depends on the face.
Can you easily define an art object?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...hy#Art_objects
Aye (not really)Something that has been created or presented in order to create an aesthetic experience, and possibly additionally to make people think of some issue.
Birthday parties are always a good excuse to see friends and family without a coffin.
Pastels on Degas works, and some other places.
Degas?
Last edited by North Star; 04-19-2015 at 03:53 PM.
Big aye to degas.
Matisse?
So with the courage of a clown, or a cur, or a kite jerkin tight at it's tether
Aye but not a huge one (sorry, stluke, if you see this).
Wyeth?
Enormous aye to Wyeth
Cezanne?
So with the courage of a clown, or a cur, or a kite jerkin tight at it's tether
Wyeth not?
Patti Smith?
(Sorry: Aye to Cezannne).
Last edited by Pompey Bum; 04-19-2015 at 04:11 PM.
Whoop whoop!
NO??!!
Yes to Cezanne, no to Patti.
Hopper?
^'Why not' probably means aye.
A big aye to Hopper (smaller than the below two, though).
Nay to Patti
most certainly Cezanne and Matisse (and Wyeth too, although not in the same screaming schoolgirl manner)
Paul Klee?
lol I think Cezanne really sucks.
So with the courage of a clown, or a cur, or a kite jerkin tight at it's tether
Of course "Wyeth not?" meant Aye. Haven't you figured out how my lame puns work, Lykren?
Yeah, Paul Klee is okay.
Argyle socks?
Oooh, I was thinking typo.
We're not schoolgirls about Wyeth... not that there's anything wrong with that!
I like the world argyle so yes.
Emotionally sensitive people, provided it isn't outright absurd?
Lykren, you've already claimed "artworks do not respect dictionaries." So, if you really believe that, you would not believe art could be defined, described, or critiqued in any way with words. So, your asking such a question is hypocritically contradicting yourself...unless your answer is "no" to that question.
Andy Warhol?
Last edited by Pike Bishop; 04-19-2015 at 04:30 PM.
Not the emotionally affected ones. We're all just as sensitive, we just don't all have to take it to the social marketplace.
The strong, silent type as a male paradigm?
Last edited by Pompey Bum; 04-19-2015 at 04:33 PM.
Paradigms are for people who can't handle fluid complexity (though maybe that's all of us). So no to them on principle.
You really think we're all equally sensitive? Not to the same things, though, right?
Somewhat relatedly: Hiding your feelings, thereby making yourself feel worse, to prevent an equal decrease in someone else's mood. Aye or nay?
Nay to Warhol.
Nay, you feeling worse will probably have an even worse effect on the other person's mood in the long term.
George Inness?
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
