Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: "Dystopia?"

  1. #1

    "Dystopia?"

    I've seen this word, dystopia, apparently used to mean the opposite of utopia. I'm confused and troubled by this usage, which I believe is due to a misunderstanding of the etymology of utopia.

    The etymology is Greek. topos refers to "a place." The problem is the meaning of the modifier, "u-" or "ou-". This modifier should mean "no." as in no place or nowhere ("erehwon" in backwards English). I think the folk who use dystopia confuse the "ou" with "eu" (meaning "good). The opposite of "good" is "bad," which is where we get the "dys-" prefix.

  2. #2
    Registered User Grit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Now.
    Posts
    272
    Blog Entries
    3
    So you say utopia means no place when directly translated. Seems spot on to me.
    While the truncheon may be used
    in lieu of conversation,
    words will always retain their power.
    Words offer the means to meaning,
    and for those who will listen,
    the enunciation of truth.

  3. #3
    Registered User Shaman_Raman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    240
    Blog Entries
    5
    I can't say I've looked into the etymology before, but the modern definition of "dystopia" given by Merriam-webster is "An imaginary place where people lead dehumanized and often fearful lives."

    Utopia :"a place for ideal perfection, especially in laws, government and social conditions."

    So by modern English, they are arguably opposites.
    Last edited by Shaman_Raman; 05-14-2013 at 04:52 PM.
    "We sat around, scratching the earth with our feet, half looking up for a sign of the end. And all the while it had long since come and gone." Alexi Murdoch

  4. #4
    Registered User Calidore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    5,071
    And the definition quoted by Shaman above is actually the second one M-W gives; the first is "an imaginary and indefinitely remote place," which fits the etymology perfectly.

    I'd also point out that words in one language can be derived from another, but that doesn't mean the definition in the new language will exactly match the pieces in the original language. Derivation isn't cloning.

    Which leads to dystopia. According to M-W, the "dys" prefix itself can mean abnormal, difficult, impaired, or bad. Again, the word fits the roots. Effectively, the words have come to mean opposite things, but just because the roots themselves aren't direct opposites, that doesn't mean that there was an error in the creation of the word(s). Again, not cloning, just inspiration, if you like.
    You must be the change you wish to see in the world. -- Mahatma Gandhi

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by Calidore View Post
    ...According to M-W, the "dys" prefix itself can mean abnormal, difficult, impaired, or bad. Again, the word fits the roots. Effectively, the words have come to mean opposite things, but just because the roots themselves aren't direct opposites, that doesn't mean that there was an error in the creation of the word(s). Again, not cloning, just inspiration, if you like.
    I was just being pedantic (I hope in a good way) by calling attention to this commonly used word, "dystopia" to mean "a bad/dysfunctional place," and the opposite of "utopia." There is no question that "utopia" was coined to mean "no place," i.e. an imaginary place that does not exist. As it happens, this was also some sort of blissful "good place." However if that were the primary meaning, the place would have been called (in English) "eutopia," but it wasn't... If that were what it was called, then the opposite would indeed be "dystopia."

    So my point is that "dystopia" (which has become a popular term for any dysfunctional society) is indeed a term based on what could be called "false etymology," or at least based on ignorance of the etymology of "utopia." It seems "dystopia" is here to stay in common English usage. It is what it is. It is neither good or bad usage. I just wanted to call attention to it.

  6. #6
    Voice of Chaos & Anarchy
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    In one of the branches of the multiverse, but I don't know which one.
    Posts
    11,335
    Blog Entries
    585
    Quote Originally Posted by Nick Capozzoli View Post
    I've seen this word, dystopia, apparently used to mean the opposite of utopia. I'm confused and troubled by this usage, which I believe is due to a misunderstanding of the etymology of utopia.

    The etymology is Greek. topos refers to "a place." The problem is the meaning of the modifier, "u-" or "ou-". This modifier should mean "no." as in no place or nowhere ("erehwon" in backwards English). I think the folk who use dystopia confuse the "ou" with "eu" (meaning "good). The opposite of "good" is "bad," which is where we get the "dys-" prefix.
    The etymology of "utopia" is what you found; it means "no place". "Dystopia" is a horrible word that is meant as the opposite of the kind of place that the book Utopia by Thomas described.

    "Dystopia" is a not quite suitable antonym for Utopia. It was devised by J. S. Mill to mean bad imaginary place, anmd the Greek is appropriate. I don't like the word, because it is used to mean something other than "bad place,"
    Last edited by PeterL; 05-17-2013 at 02:30 PM. Reason: clarification

  7. #7
    Registered User kelby_lake's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    3,620
    Isn't dystopia really another form of utopia then, except a dysfunctional one?

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-30-2011, 01:34 AM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-11-2010, 06:59 PM
  3. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-09-2009, 05:18 PM
  4. "Fall of Green Statue," "#1," and "Noon"
    By TheUsersAreReal in forum Personal Poetry
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-25-2009, 02:06 PM
  5. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-13-2007, 10:03 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •