Apart from much devoting much ink to an inexplicable (to yours fooly, anyway) fascination with the British Royal Family, these magazines spotlight celebrities, which include principal players in lurid murder cases as well as legitimate show biz personalities--rarely artists known for their accomplishments and not even run-of-the-mill actors and actresses but rather those involved in embarrassing situations, such as "messy" divorces or DUI arrests. QUOTE]
Thankfully, we haven't reached the stage where checkout magazines incorporate things that have more recently become the province of YouTube, but the triviality of virtually all things royal is also a favourite preoccupation of the British. Yesterday I saw a newspaper item with pictures of Prince Harry( yes the same one) swanning around the White House with Mrs Obama. It's even likely that there are people who consider Harry to be more interesting than that other arch-exponent of the inconsequential, Justin Timberlake: whose name frequently features on the cover of 'celebrity' magazines.
For those of us who consider the monarchy to be the epitome of tedium, it's disheartening to realise that it's the unqualified adoration of their followers that keeps the whole gaudy show on the road and, given that the British government resorted to the cinema industry to stage the opening ceremony of the Olympic Games, one wonders how long it will be before Baz Luhrmann is called in to stage the state opening of parliament.
The media in general, and not only celebrity magazines, are all too willing to pander to the obsessional behaviour of royal groupies so that even pictures like this will never persuade them to give up their addiction.
