I somehow can't help but think of ''Lady 's Chatterley's Lover'' when I think of Bovary but that is me. I think differently.
The other thing I have to admit is that there is nothing liberating about Emma in Bovary. The way I look at it is that she was 'passed on' from one man to another and then let down by the very lovers she thought highly of. It tells me something about the society she lived in and reinforces the lack of emotional attachments the characters in Bovary seem to have been objected too. The exploits of Emma were purely sexual and nothing else came out of it and that is as far as I am concerned vacuous and not without consequences.
I could not help but notice the word OVARY in B/OVARY. Maybe that is another reason why I chose to focus on the word 'Madame' in contrast with a 'Madam' that runs a brothel.
Maybe Flaubert obsession for the 'juste word' was eventually fulfilled with the anagrams of 'Madame de Bovary' ie 'madam and ovary' and what is left are the letters 'E' 'DE' 'B' an anagram for BEDE/BEBE. Who knows.
That is my interpretations of things and of course anything goes when it comes to a story with a title it is open to suggestions and mine is as such.
One thing I do find fascinating about Madame de Bovary is that the heroine of the book is female called Emma and the writer is Flaubert a male. In contrast Jayne Eyre a female heroine to Bronte's sister a female writer or even Emma with Jane Austen.
The question is this:
Do male writers tend to fantasise their female lead characters with sexual subjectories for a deliverance of some kind a liberation of some sort take Lolita again Nabokov is a male writer.
It is just an observation worthy of making.



Reply With Quote