As pretty much the whole world is aware, Mrs Thatcher died yesterday morning. Whilst it was inevitable that a figure who was so controversial in life should also cause controversy in death, I'll admit that I've been surprised at just how pronounced it has been.
I am by nature a very political person, and a lot of my friends consequently are politically interested: it was very noticeable that my facebook page yesterday was neatly divided into two camps, one of which was in grief and one of which was in jubilant mood. My comments were fairly non-commital at first: I recognised her as an important, if divisive figure. But as the day wore on, I began to find it increasingly ghoulish how certain groups were greeting the death of frail, demented old woman with almost seraphic joy - applause at the NUS conference, street parties in Brixton and Glasgow, the leader of the Durham Miners declaring it 'the happiest day of my life.'
Consequently, I ended up engaging in several FB debates on the subject, and was suprised at the manner in which several of my friends, who are intelligent and civilized people, were nevertheless declaring this behaviour as appropriate. I then, I must admit, I thought back to my reaction to the death of Hugo Chavez, and whilst I certainly did not crack open the champagne and take to dancing in the street over that, I must admit that I did express to several friends (in private, not in public) that 'my only regret was that he did not die swinging from a lamppost.' I would, however, argue that there was a world of difference between the situations of Chavez and Thatcher.
All this is a long preamble to asking the ethical question: is it ever justifiable to celebrate the death of someone? If it is, then to what extent? What factors affect whether or not it is justified? Obviously, we mustn't get drawn into discussing politics here - this must be a purely abstract/hypothetical discussion, but I am interested to hear views.


Reply With Quote


