An air of classicality? The kind seen in Dickensian novels? Mark twain, Nabokov, Conrad and the like that go back to Marlow, Shakespeare, Milton, Bunyan endlessly who write bulkily and tirelessly and of course passionately. We are not running short of writers and every year we have volumes, catalogues of new books and publishers are running after the books that can appeal to the tastes the mass and serious literature is not for the mass since they are not usually comprehensible.
There are of course writers wining bookers, novel prizes and many others too. Maybe they are worth their works to give them classical breaths.
The Paulo Coelho type has been gaining wider readership, popularity and of course enjoying fat advances and increasingly greater publicity. The overrating of such writers is shadowing the few writers whose luminosity cannot outshine their comradely commercially compeering legions.
When it comes to composing poetry we cannot find equals of TS Eliot, Ezra Pound, Wordsworth, Shelly, William Blake, just to name a few.
I do not mean there is a dearth of good writers today. Literature in assorted genres are on the rise no doubt, but the ones to eclipse Sartre, Kafka, Hemingway and the type are not in their multitudes today.
Maybe the world is changing and tastes are evolving and interests are getting diverse. We are globalizing our domains of thoughts and crisscrossing geographical fronteirs and cultural and religious barricades.
The Soviet Union has been decomposed into Russia and china took part in things ranging from Olympics through beauty contests to taking interestingly the recent awarding of the novel prize to one of its authors.
Maybe literature is breaking through some of the narrow cloves to be more pervasive, inclusive and assuasive.
I am interested to discuss this issue and learn from your opinions.


Reply With Quote
