Theodicy for or against God

[cafolini]

Not really. You've just gone back to Voltaire.

The fact that it isn't inevitable is pretty simple, because it's learned behaviour.

You taught the course? LOL

[cacian]

The impersonation of God is not very productive. But people make it look inevitable. Food for atheists to chew with arrogance.

I am sure god does not mind one bit if atheists think nothing of him/her. No hard feelings there.

[The Atheist]

I am sure god does not mind one bit if atheists think nothing of him/her. No hard feelings there.

That's one of the things I find highly amusing.

Theists must attack atheists, yet their invisible friend is an omnipotent ruler of the universe. Does he really need the help of humans?

[cacian]

That's one of the things I find highly amusing.

Theists must attack atheists, yet their invisible friend is an omnipotent ruler of the universe. Does he really need the help of humans?

Exactly he does not and that it the point. I think the whole argument is just because people argue not necessarily about god but just because the concept is there then they do/will.
I was meant what does your avatar picture meant to represent? haha.

[The Atheist]

Sorry - I screwed up the quotes. I answered that but must have deleted it by mistake.

The avatar is the Flying Spaghetti Monster, which materialised outside our house one day.

[cacian]

Sorry - I screwed up the quotes. I answered that but must have deleted it by mistake.

The avatar is the Flying Spaghetti Monster, which materialised outside our house one day.

Haha sorry I did see your answer in the other thread. That must have been one hell of a freight when it just appeared from nowhere.
The flying monster is funny I did not know there was any flying ones until now