Buying through this banner helps support the forum!
Page 10 of 33 FirstFirst ... 5678910111213141520 ... LastLast
Results 136 to 150 of 484

Thread: The right to bear arms

  1. #136
    Registered User prendrelemick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Yorkshire
    Posts
    4,871
    Blog Entries
    29
    The Link between the shootings and the mental health of the perpetrator is always noticed after the event. The gun lobby are turning the debate in that direction.

    Americans want to "do something" but don't want to give up their guns, Mental Health could be just the patsy they need, as violent videos were in the past.


    And yes, I'm an old cynic.

    Quote Originally Posted by BienvenuJDC View Post
    There are more alcohol related violence and deaths than gun related deaths. I've never heard of anyone wanting to ban alcohol or have stricter alcohol control measures.

    Why is that?
    Actually, there are many who want tighter alcohol controls.
    ay up

  2. #137
    BadWoolf JuniperWoolf's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    The North
    Posts
    4,433
    Blog Entries
    28
    Two pertinent points to consider:

    1. Most mass shooters, especially the more recent ones, wear bullet proof gear. The "if there were no gun-free zones we would be able to shoot psychos" argument should be seen in this context, for honesty's sake. I'm pretty sure the shooter in this instance was wearing a bullet proof vest, and that theater shooter who thought he was batman was practically wearing full body armor.

    2. When assault rifles were banned by Clinton in 1994, it had no impact on gun crime.

    Someone clever said this earlier today, until I hear a better argument I agree with him:

    I'm interested why people need something to blame at all.

    Ban assault rifles. Fine. The gun's he used were 'Military Style' (in looks) but they weren't assault rifles. If you want to look at legislation for guns that actually impact people, look at handguns (he was carrying two) but lets not pretend like a ban on "assault rifles", which are already banned in most states, would have had any impact on this tragedy.

    Improve mental health? Another ghost argument. The school noticed his behavior in 07 and brought it up with his mother and a psychologist. As a result his mother pulled him out of school and taught him from home. The alimony she received in child care from his father was over $250,000 a year -more than enough than would be needed to find proper care for someone who was mentally ill.

    Its an unfortunate circumstance, but the reality is this was 1 person, out of a country of 370 million, who just lost it. On average in the US we have 1.25 people who go bat-**** crazy each year and go on a rampage. The slashing last Friday in China, the same day as the events in CT, outline how even if we completely regulate guns, people will find a way to exhibit their chaos on the world. When we talk of broad sweeping changes that will affect everyone in America, what we should stop and ask is "Of the 11 people who have gone off the deep-end in the last year. Will making this change actually help one of 'Them' ?"
    A net that covers 370 million people is a pretty big net, expecting eleven fish not to slip through is unreasonable. Other countries with high populations don't have as much of a problem, but I think the American gun obsession is cultural and you can't just apply a quick fix to culture.

    Quote Originally Posted by tonywalt View Post
    Guns will decrease in popularity in the US when:

    Tea goes down in poularity in UK, Football in Brazil, and la bella figura in Italy. The pilgrims jumped off the boat with guns it's part of the fabric of the culture- maybe not so much with this demographic(Onlit) - but believe we are not in the Main. From accross the other pond it looks crazy.

    Do we have any regular onlitters born Texans on here? Or Louisiana born and raised? Mississippi ? I only point those three out as I lived down there and pretty familiar with the entrenched gun culture that is ever present there. Would be interested in their perspective.
    Exactly.
    Last edited by JuniperWoolf; 12-19-2012 at 04:34 AM.
    __________________
    "Personal note: When I was a little kid my mother told me not to stare into the sun. So once when I was six, I did. At first the brightness was overwhelming, but I had seen that before. I kept looking, forcing myself not to blink, and then the brightness began to dissolve. My pupils shrunk to pinholes and everything came into focus and for a moment I understood. The doctors didn't know if my eyes would ever heal."
    -Pi


  3. #138
    Registered User Emil Miller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    London, England
    Posts
    6,499
    Quote Originally Posted by prendrelemick View Post
    Actually, there are many who want tighter alcohol controls.
    I think this applies to the UK rather than the US where there seems to be a much more sensible approach to alcohol.
    If Americans have a fetish for guns, then alcohol is the British fetish. Hospital admissions, not least in Accident and Emergency, for alcohol related problems are a major cause for concern and criminal damage likewise.
    The British have an infantile approach to drinking that has lead to ongoing calls for control but, as in the US where the gun lobby have political sway, in the UK the brewing industry keeps protesters at bay in much the same way.
    "L'art de la statistique est de tirer des conclusions erronèes a partir de chiffres exacts." Napoléon Bonaparte.

    "Je crois que beaucoup de gens sont dans cet état d’esprit: au fond, ils ne sentent pas concernés par l’Histoire. Mais pourtant, de temps à autre, l’Histoire pose sa main sur eux." Michel Houellebecq.

  4. #139
    Clinging to Douvres rocks Gilliatt Gurgle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    2,716
    Quote Originally Posted by tonywalt View Post
    ....Do we have any regular onlitters born Texans on here? ...Would be interested in their perspective.

    Eh-hmm...Yeee haw, howdy Tony...oh, and you did get my persepctive. Please refer to post 14, 54 and 57

    Quote Originally Posted by Lokasenna View Post
    Qimi said she was from Texas earlier on, and she clearly has pretty strong views on this subject - I only know one Texan in the real world, and she is most definitely of the 'God, guns, and babies' variety.
    Hot damn, I luv my guns and wouldn't you know, this gun tot'n Texan is also a philatilist, numismaticist, enjoys shooting pictures, watercolor, sketching,woodworking, rock hound, enjoys reading, watching Star Trek (TOS), listening to Bob Wills and Dvorak, but contrary to what many of you outsiders have come to believe from watching Dallas, there's no oil well in my yard.


    Quote Originally Posted by JuniperWoolf View Post
    ...A net that covers 370 million people is a pretty big net, expecting eleven fish not to slip through is unreasonable. Other countries with high populations don't have as much of a problem, but I think the American gun obsession is cultural and you can't just apply a quick fix to culture...
    Good point.
    "Mongo only pawn in game of life" - Mongo

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SKRma7PDW10

  5. #140
    running amok Sancho's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    3,265
    Yup, yup, yup, howdy, howdy. That thar is Texas talk.

    Anyway, I think, the problem with guns in this country is not so much the mass shootings as the onesies twosies. An unhinged person bent on mass murder will figure out a way, with or without a gun. But with so many guns laying around, it's just too easy for somebody to pick one up and instantly (and permanently) solve their problem: husbands and wives blowing each other away, taking care of the neighbor with the barky dog, or the pinhead who just cut you off in traffic - ready, fire, aim.

    How many times have you read about a little kid getting into the family gun cabinet and then accidentally capping his little sister. Nobody evolved in that incident will ever feel good again, for the rest of their lives. Guns are just too easy, too quick, too deadly, and too unforgiving. And humans are too emotional.

    Arming everybody (Ted Nugent excepted) has got to be about the stupidest thing I've ever heard. Here's my example: the US Army is pretty good at guns. They know how to shoot and they're good at it. I have personally trusted my life to young soldiers with automatic weapons. But the idea of an entire brigade of soldiers walking around in garrison with concealed handguns is ludicrous. Even after the shooting at Fort Hood, the Commanding General never seriously considered letting everybody arm themselves on post as a deterrent for a kook with a gun and an attitude. He knew that a bunch of 18 and 20 year-olds, all packing, would be bloody. Guys would be blowing each other away for cutting the line at Burger King.
    Uhhhh...

  6. #141
    Maybe YesNo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    For Mill, South Carolina
    Posts
    9,532
    Blog Entries
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by Sancho View Post
    Even after the shooting at Fort Hood, the Commanding General never seriously considered letting everybody arm themselves on post as a deterrent for a kook with a gun and an attitude. He knew that a bunch of 18 and 20 year-olds, all packing, would be bloody. Guys would be blowing each other away for cutting the line at Burger King.
    That reminds me of the rapper shootout scene from Scary Movie 3. I'd link to it but I don't want to stereotype blacks although it is quite funny.

    I have a brother who lives in Texas and a cousin who used to. Neither of them are as nutty as my sister who hunts with a bow and arrow in Indiana. Based on what happened in Connecticut, my current stereotype of people to be cautious about are rich white kids from the pseudo-enlightened east coast, but I'm sure most of them are OK as well.
    Last edited by YesNo; 12-19-2012 at 10:10 AM.

  7. #142
    Artist and Bibliophile stlukesguild's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    The USA... or thereabouts
    Posts
    6,083
    Blog Entries
    78
    For a start, I've never even been on the bloody NRA website. Right now, bombs have killed less people. If you stop these killers accessing guns, they'll use bombs instead. Which will result in more death, don't you agree? Outright banning guns will do nothing but make the situation worse. What is needed is better checks on WHO can buy a gun, research to try and work out why these killers snap, and (in my opinion) a change in attitude towards childrens upbringing.

    The problem with your theory lies in accessibility. Handguns are incredibly accessible... easier to obtain than a driver's license. The US is clearly far too ingrained in its obsession with guns to eliminate them completely... bot yet. many many more children will have to die before that ever happens. But the problem isn't the handgun kept for self defense or the hunting rifle... its the ability to easily purchase dozens of guns including semi-automatic and fully automatic weapons with an endless supply of ammo. These have absolutely no practical use except in killing people. Now unless there has been a rash of home invasions involving dozens of invaders I don't see the point.

    We have the ability to track such things. I can't buy more than a couple bottles of certain over-the-counter medications in a given month because they are known to be used in the production of dangerous illegal drugs. The elements needed for the production of most bombs are also closely monitored and the purchase of such will likely lead to a visit from your friendly FBI agents.

    Attempting to divert the focus to mental health services and parenting is absurdly ridiculous. How do you suppose we monitor, let alone enforce proper parenting? How do we recognize which mentally ill individual is likely to snap? What do we do... lock anyone up that we have a sneaking suspicion about? Most of the deaths by handgun that occur in homes are not homeowners killing intruders or unknown intruders killing homeowners, but rather the result of a dispute (often sexual... husband cheating on wife, etc..) between friends and family. The argument escalates and a person not known for any mental illness snaps... and uses the accessible gun. We repeatedly hear the same story with the shooter who snaps as a result of problems with co-workers or the loss of a job. Few of these mass-murders involve an individual who was identified as mentally ill. Who do you imagine will have the right to identify you or me... or that person who doesn't fit their concept of "normal" as a potential threat?

    There are more alcohol related violence and deaths than gun related deaths. I've never heard of anyone wanting to ban alcohol or have stricter alcohol control measures.

    Why is that?


    Your point is moot. The purpose of alcohol is not solely to kill... unlike guns. And there are strict controls on things such as driving while intoxicated and there are indeed those who continue to push for stricter enforcement of drunk driving laws.
    Beware of the man with just one book. -Ovid
    The man who doesn't read good books has no advantage over the man who can't read them.- Mark Twain
    My Blog: Of Delicious Recoil
    http://stlukesguild.tumblr.com/

  8. #143
    Registered User Emil Miller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    London, England
    Posts
    6,499
    Quote Originally Posted by mortalterror View Post
    Our guns are for keeping the Queen of England out of our face. You blokes might have broke free centuries ago if you'd had them. I bet the Irish were happy they kept theirs when the English came a knockin'.
    Actually we did break free in 1649 when the King was beheaded and Oliver Cromwell became the top man. He also closed parliament for the reasons stated in this speech. Possibly the greatest of all Englishmen, the bauble he refers to is that of the Mace which was supposed to symbolize the authority of parliament. Unfortunately, when he died, the Monarchy was restored.

    Dissolution of the Long Parliament by Oliver Cromwell given to the House of Commons, 20 April 1653

    It is high time for me to put an end to your sitting in this place, which you have dishonored by your contempt of all virtue, and defiled by your practice of every vice; ye are a factious crew, and enemies to all good government; ye are a pack of mercenary wretches, and would like Esau sell your country for a mess of pottage, and like Judas betray your God for a few pieces of money.

    Is there a single virtue now remaining amongst you? Is there one vice you do not possess? Ye have no more religion than my horse; gold is your God; which of you have not barter'd your conscience for bribes? Is there a man amongst you that has the least care for the good of the Commonwealth?

    Ye sordid prostitutes have you not defil'd this sacred place, and turn'd the Lord's temple into a den of thieves, by your immoral principles and wicked practices? Ye are grown intolerably odious to the whole nation; you were deputed here by the people to get grievances redress'd, are yourselves gone! So! Take away that shining bauble there, and lock up the doors.

    In the name of God, go!

    Plus ça change ......
    "L'art de la statistique est de tirer des conclusions erronèes a partir de chiffres exacts." Napoléon Bonaparte.

    "Je crois que beaucoup de gens sont dans cet état d’esprit: au fond, ils ne sentent pas concernés par l’Histoire. Mais pourtant, de temps à autre, l’Histoire pose sa main sur eux." Michel Houellebecq.

  9. #144
    Existentialist Varenne Rodin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    West
    Posts
    1,409
    Blog Entries
    6
    Quote Originally Posted by stlukesguild View Post
    There are more alcohol related violence and deaths than gun related deaths. I've never heard of anyone wanting to ban alcohol or have stricter alcohol control measures.

    Why is that?


    Your point is moot. The purpose of alcohol is not solely to kill... unlike guns. And there are strict controls on things such as driving while intoxicated and there are indeed those who continue to push for stricter enforcement of drunk driving laws.
    You're really good at this.

  10. #145
    Original Poster Buh4Bee's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    At the north border
    Posts
    3,381
    Blog Entries
    156
    We have to keep the children safe, but we, now also, have to live in a police state as well. And even with heightened security measures, the schools may still not be safe. Obama is correct in his stance to not only address gun reform, but also mental health access. We need to reform our gun laws. The other issue the American population faces is easy access to affordable mental healthcare. The access in poorer areas can be limited, simple because there are not enough providers. I think Obama is very smart in leveraging this issue now to get some things started. People are still very upset, meaning that the issues have a lot of support from the general population.

    As an elementary school teacher, I am feeling quite numb. I lost a student earlier this year to a tractor accident and another student of mine is currently receiving radiation treatment for a brain tumor. When you see some much loss of life of children, it has to be the most sickening thing you can think of. I am not going to idealize children, but they are innocent. Obama understand this at a very deep level, and I am glad he is our President.
    Last edited by Buh4Bee; 12-19-2012 at 08:48 PM.

  11. #146
    All are at the crossroads qimissung's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Lost in the bell's curve
    Posts
    5,123
    Blog Entries
    66
    Very thoughtful post, Buh4Bee.
    "The important thing is not to stop questioning. Curiosity has its' own reason for existing." ~ Albert Einstein
    "Remember, no matter where you go, there you are." Buckaroo Bonzai
    "Some people say I done alright for a girl." Melanie Safka

  12. #147
    A User, but Registered! tonywalt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Cayman Palms, Cayman Islands, Cayman Islands
    Posts
    6,917
    Blog Entries
    4
    http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/20/op...it_th_20121220

    The alarming part of this is the amount of homicides per year, compared to the other OECD countries.

  13. #148
    Maybe YesNo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    For Mill, South Carolina
    Posts
    9,532
    Blog Entries
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by tonywalt View Post
    http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/20/op...it_th_20121220

    The alarming part of this is the amount of homicides per year, compared to the other OECD countries.
    I especially liked how that data was presented as rate per 100,000 population.

  14. #149
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    London
    Posts
    918
    Blog Entries
    2
    That data doesn't really prove much. Of course if there are more guns there will be more gun homicides. What we should really look at is the total homicide rate for any weapon (which is probably still higher in America than in most).

  15. #150
    All are at the crossroads qimissung's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Lost in the bell's curve
    Posts
    5,123
    Blog Entries
    66
    Quote Originally Posted by prendrelemick View Post
    The Link between the shootings and the mental health of the perpetrator is always noticed after the event. The gun lobby are turning the debate in that direction.

    Americans want to "do something" but don't want to give up their guns, Mental Health could be just the patsy they need, as violent videos were in the past.


    And yes, I'm an old cynic.
    To those who argue that the mental health issue is a patsy, yes, it certainly could be, in the hands of the NRA who are most assuredly adept at deflecting attention from their rather rabid views, but it should not be a case of one or the other. I do feel that we neglect mental health issues in our country. Getting access to good mental health care is really only possible for the very well off (is it ironic that Nancy Lanza falls into that category?). I've had much frustration and experience in that area.

    Obviously better gun control laws are important. But I think a determined push for both is equally important.
    "The important thing is not to stop questioning. Curiosity has its' own reason for existing." ~ Albert Einstein
    "Remember, no matter where you go, there you are." Buckaroo Bonzai
    "Some people say I done alright for a girl." Melanie Safka

Similar Threads

  1. Gummy bear pole!
    By stephofthenight in forum General Chat
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 12-15-2009, 12:28 PM
  2. On seeing Emily Bear on Youtube
    By PrinceMyshkin in forum Personal Poetry
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-28-2009, 04:34 PM
  3. name a little emo bear
    By SleepyWitch in forum General Chat
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: 08-14-2008, 08:53 AM
  4. A Dancing Bear
    By B-Mental in forum Write a Book Review
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 07-22-2008, 08:59 AM
  5. My Big Teddy Bear
    By ashecole in forum Personal Poetry
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 11-24-2005, 03:31 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •