Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 31 to 39 of 39

Thread: The Most Unfaithful Film Adaptations

  1. #31
    Registered User kelby_lake's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    3,620
    Quote Originally Posted by Emil Miller View Post
    I'm not surprised that 75% of the book was left out, from what I have read on this forum, Faulkner was mind-numbingly prolix and that's why I haven't read him. During the 1960s, Hollywood went big on Southern Gothic and a spate of films followed one another until the genre became a caricature of itself. For my sins I saw a number of them but when I read that one critic described S&F as a fourth carbon copy of Chekhov in Dixie, I decided to give it a miss.
    You're right about bizarre miscasting: what on earth are Margaret Leighton and Françoise Rosay doing in such a film?
    And we've got Yul Brynner as the man of the house!

  2. #32
    Registered User Emil Miller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    London, England
    Posts
    6,499
    Quote Originally Posted by kelby_lake View Post
    And we've got Yul Brynner as the man of the house!
    Yes and wearing hair, according to my reference.
    "L'art de la statistique est de tirer des conclusions erronèes a partir de chiffres exacts." Napoléon Bonaparte.

    "Je crois que beaucoup de gens sont dans cet état d’esprit: au fond, ils ne sentent pas concernés par l’Histoire. Mais pourtant, de temps à autre, l’Histoire pose sa main sur eux." Michel Houellebecq.

  3. #33
    Registered User kelby_lake's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    3,620
    Quote Originally Posted by Emil Miller View Post
    Yes and wearing hair, according to my reference.
    He gives his adopted niece quite a kissing :O

  4. #34
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    114
    The movie "Rebecca of Sunnybrook Farm" starring Shirley Temple wasn't anything like the book.

  5. #35
    Bibliophile JBI's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    6,360
    Quote Originally Posted by stlukesguild View Post
    Like an artist taking a story from the bible. He's not going to have the Pope tell him how to paint.

    The Popes, Cardinals, Bishops, etc... actually did just that in a good many instances. Artists often worked with theologians who directed them as to iconography and the appropriate or accepted means of portraying a given narrative. Of course the artists of the past often made attempts at pushing the limitations, but it has really only been over the last century or so that most artists have been free to interpret an existing narrative as they wish... or invent their own narratives. This has had both positive and negative impact upon art. It has allowed artists the greatest freedom. On the other hand, artists cannot count upon the audience recognizing the the common narratives.
    What do you mAke then of Caravaggio's religious works. That is probably in line with setting Heart of Darkness in Vietnam/Cambodia.

    Are we going to call that faithless or adaptive. The same could be said for the Samurai Shakespeare adaptations by Kurosawa or the cowboy samurai adaptations going the other way.

  6. #36
    Executioner, protect me Kyriakos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Last Circle
    Posts
    884
    Not an adaptation, but the movie "Kafka" starring Jeremy Irons (who i like otherwise) simply had nothing to do with Franz Kafka. It was a very big let-down.

  7. #37
    A User, but Registered! tonywalt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Cayman Palms, Cayman Islands, Cayman Islands
    Posts
    6,917
    Blog Entries
    4
    Brighton Rock (2010 film) - I suppose they had to modernise it a bit-I think Graham Greene would approve.

  8. #38
    Registered User Emil Miller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    London, England
    Posts
    6,499
    Quote Originally Posted by tonywalt View Post
    Brighton Rock (2010 film) - I suppose they had to modernise it a bit-I think Graham Greene would approve.
    I agree that this is a most unfaithful adaptation. Compared to the original film this version is an insult to the intelligence and nothing to do with Greene's story. I have seen excepts of it on YouTube and wasn't surprised to find it just another rip off for those who haven't read the book. Knowing something about Greene, I would say that he would have been upset although not surprised at the practice of usurping a brilliant film to make a fast buck out of the cinematically ignorant.
    "L'art de la statistique est de tirer des conclusions erronèes a partir de chiffres exacts." Napoléon Bonaparte.

    "Je crois que beaucoup de gens sont dans cet état d’esprit: au fond, ils ne sentent pas concernés par l’Histoire. Mais pourtant, de temps à autre, l’Histoire pose sa main sur eux." Michel Houellebecq.

  9. #39
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    3,123
    Blow-up. In many ways the film is much better than the text on which it is based.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Similar Threads

  1. Looking for a short story for film adapation
    By hampusforev in forum General Movies, Music, and Television
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 06-17-2011, 11:11 AM
  2. The 2002 film of Nicholas Nickleby
    By Jim Spreckels in forum Nicholas Nickleby
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 05-17-2010, 03:56 PM
  3. Film adaptations of Alice in Wonderland
    By ashaleena in forum Alice's Adventures in Wonderland
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11-19-2009, 07:54 AM
  4. Film Versions of Wuthering Heights.
    By Peripatetics in forum Wuthering Heights
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11-16-2009, 11:31 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •