Well no, see, it's the fact that you're saying "all women are like this and if they aren't then they're liars" that I disagree with. Even if there is a general tendancy for the female population to lbe sexually attracted to one kind of person (and that's general tendancy, the first word there is very important), it's impossible for ALL of them to, and it's also impossible to see inside any one person's head to tell them what they're thinking. That's beyond presumptuous, it's bordering on mystical. Are you a mind reader?
Haha, we even wear bright red berets to announce our coming so the enemy doesn't get rudely surprised.
"Relationships" is a bit far, in my experience women don't get into "relationships" with them (this is an "all ages forum," but I think you know what women do with them). I don't have numbers in front of me, but most "boyfriends" that I know are indeed "nice." *edit* Oh yeah, Pip's right, I remember now that people tend to choose mates (meaning long-term) who are similar to themselves. I'll photocopy the page and post it here if the "women want relationships with jerks" malarky doesn't die.
This forum is particularly bad, I've never heard anyone in real life do the whole "grr, women just want our walets!" tirade. Is this 2012, or 1952? Next they'll be saying "grr, all black people want is watermelon, and Asians want to do all our math!"



Reply With Quote






- isn't the sarcasm emoticon, it's the satisfaction emoticon. This one is supposed to be:
- but on litnet the smile is too wide so it looks more like a squee emoticon. So far I've found that footnotes work best, although apparently there's a font.

