
Originally Posted by
Ohmyscience
I hope I can clarify earlier that there is a supposition of an agency behind those that commit crimes which by a jury of peers can be judged. If this agency (free will) does not exists, then morally speaking punishing criminals is like putting goats on trial for a crime. Also I don't see the distinction between free will and freedom of choices. Even if you are aware of your choices is this awareness done without influence? I liked the comparison between love and free will, in that they both seem to me man made and they gained value over time.