Cynical as I am, I was sincerely worried when Stothard replaced Mount as editor. But the magazine seems to be doing very well from the looks of it. There have been a few changes -- a new freelancer (Greenberg) to replace Kavanagh, a bit more advertising (quite a lot of it full-page colour), and generally 32 pages instead of 36 or 40 -- but the quality of writing is still very good, with no attempt to popularise. Also seems to be more female reviewers.
Any thoughts? Disagreements?



Reply With Quote
I'm nobody, who are you?
