In August, we will be reading Razor's Edge by Somerset Maugham.
Please post your thoughts and comments in this thread.
Printable View
In August, we will be reading Razor's Edge by Somerset Maugham.
Please post your thoughts and comments in this thread.
I'm actually most of the way through it already :) I am enjoying it, it is similar in a way to the quite brilliant 'The Moon and Sixpence' though not quite its equal. Looking forward to some discussion.
I finished The Razor's Edge day before yesterday, it's the first by Maugham I've read. Is this typical of his style?
An article about Maugham I happened across on the NYT. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/25/bo...ooksupdateema1
I would say so, it's his usual simple style. I do recommend The Moon And Sixpence if you enjoyed this one, it's one of my favourite books. It's also a portrait of an unusual figure (based on Paul Gauguin) who ignores social pressure and does his own thing.
I would like to hear more about Larry in this one but i guess his point is comparing the materialist and ultimately lonely life of Elliot(do you think he is meant to be gay?) and the self chosen life of poverty and spiritual fulfillment of Larry.
I will look into The Moon and Sixpence. I did enjoy TRE, although the last bit about Larry's supposed spiritual fulfillment to be a bit droning. It's possible that if it hadn't been so close to the end, I'd have put the book down at that point. It just didn't ring true to me. But all in all the story pulled me along, although I sometimes wanted to slap Isabel.
Maugham put across the emptiness Larry felt very well, almost too well in a way. I would have appreciated more of Larry's inner life.
As for Elliott being gay or not, I'd assumed he was...what with the book being written in the early 40's Maugham wouldn't have been able to come out in any blatant way about his sexual orientation.
An interesting article on WSM. I have read Salina Hastings biography of Maugham and it is probably definitive in that it leaves no known stones unturned. Much of his life was detailed in a better, to my mind, biography by Ted Morgan ( a man, incidentally, whose life is almost as interesting as Maugham's own ); Hastings merely adds the icing on the cake. For all that the New York Times article tries to write Maugham off, it is interesting to note that the same has been said by many other critics; but here we are, forty eight years after his death, and he is still very much in print. Of course, there will come a time when he is no longer read but that will be the reading public's loss.Quote:
Originally Posted by plainjane
Quite an absorbing tale; I appreciated the unencumbered, straight-forward style of narrative.
Who would you prefer for a traveling companion: Elliott or Larry?
You know that is an interesting point. Elliott as a companion was my first automatic choice, however Larry could be interesting as well. Maybe alternating tours? :pQuote:
Originally Posted by bouquin
Definitely Larry for me, i actually found him somewhat inspiring. I wonder if Maugham had read Siddhartha by Hesse when he wrote this... they would be a good double header.
Somerset Maugham and Hesse apparently foresaw that the West would eventually become interested in and even embrace Eastern religions and culture as a whole.
How would you judge Isabel with regards the zubrovka trap that she set up for Sophie?
I doubt if Maugham was influenced by Hesse in relation to Eastern religions. By the time he came to write The Razor's Edge, he had travelled extensively in the Far East and had seen the impact of some Asiatic religions on certain white men he'd met in his travels; mention of which can be seen in some of the short stories and a couple of the novels.
World War I, are The Sun Also Rises and The Razor's Edge. I have read both any number of times, and I still don't know which I prefer. Perhaps it's a dead heat. I have read a lot of Maugham, including all his short stries in four volumes, but I prefer this novel even more so than The Moon and Sixpence and Of Human Bondage.
If you like the book, be sure to watch the movie. Tyrone Power is Larry, Gene Tierney as Isabelle, and the incomparable Clifton Web as Elliot. Some say that Clifton Web was gay, but others that he was asexual. Clifton Web was very close to his mother, and when she died he was almost inconsolable. This prompted some wit to say, "Poor Clifton, left an orphan at age 65! I think it was Oscar Levant.
As for Maugham's sexuality, I have never read a biography, but he did leave his wife and live in France with another man for a number of years.
:D Yes, that sounds like Oscar Levant.Quote:
Originally Posted by dfloyd
Like many homosexuals, Maugham was very promiscuous but was able to keep it under wraps throughout his life because it wasn't considered a subject for polite conversation. At that time there appears to have been an international ring of high society homosexuals that included people such as Maugham, Thomas Mann, Noel Coward etc. This is perhaps most sharply delineated in Salina Hastings biography of Maugham already referred to, but his sexual proclivities had already been known for quite some time.
but I didn't know about Thomas Mann, not that it matters much. I think these people kept their sexual proclivities more to temselves rather than parading them for all to see, such as Truman Capote.
I last saw Noel Coward in Graham Greene's "Our Man in Havana", a great spy spoof. John Le Carre tried to equal it in "The Panama Tailor", but it didn't come off as well as Grahame Greene's novel.
In Donald Prater's biography of Mann his homosexuality is only hinted at, but in Selina Hastings biography of Maugham she relates a specific instance of one of Maugham's partners also having a homosexual relationship with Mann.Quote:
Originally Posted by dfloyd
They were obviously more discreet than would have been the case today because the general public would not have stood for it; let alone the police.
The fact that Noel Coward was homosexual made the scene where he approaches Alec Guinness in the bar in Havana and asks him to accompany him to the toilet all the funnier. Especially when Guinness refuses and Coward says: "Why not? You're an Englishman aren't you?"
Well when you have war hero and brilliant mathematician Alan Turing being chemically castrated for homosexuality around that time in Britain, it's not like you would be sensible to publicly announce it. If decrypting the Nazi codes wouldn't protect you, being a famous novelist wouldn't either. You seem to be forgetting that homosexuality wasn't legal until the 70s.Quote:
Originally Posted by dfloyd
On the subject of Thomas Mann, he reveals his sexuality as bisexual in his diaries.
This insistence as if heterosexuals don't broadcast their sexual proclivities in public. What do you consider a wedding band to declare, if not that the person is in a heterosexual relationship. The broadcasting of heterosexual proclivity is so common in our society that it is just taken as given and doesn't shock our sensibilities.
Oh, how we love discussing people's sexuality more than anything else! :p
So, I have checked the libraries in two different counties and two nearby book stores; no chance.
Is it a good book really? Worth ordering it online?
I don't know which bookstores you have tried but I know that it's readily available in London. I am naturally biased in favour of it as it is one of my favourite novels. However, the poll shows a favourable reaction to it and if I couldn't get it locally, I would certainly get it online. If you are not familiar with Maugham, it will give you a good idea of his unique writing style; easy to read but very insightful into human nature and without being in any way judgemental.Quote:
Originally Posted by Scheherazade
I have tried a small bookstore as well as local branch of Waterstones. I will see how I get on with the book I am reading at the moment and order it next week maybe.Is this where you got the inspiration for your attitude towards music then? :pQuote:
Originally Posted by Brian Bean
Well pop music is often described as being a great noise to listen to.Quote:
Originally Posted by Scheherazade
I am in complete agreement with this sentiment because the etymology of the word is:
early 13c., "loud outcry, clamor, shouting," from O.Fr. noise "uproar, brawl" apparently from L. nausea "disgust, annoyance, discomfort," lit. "seasickness" (see nausea). Another theory traces the O.Fr. word to L. noxia "hurting, injury, damage." OED considers that "the sense of the word is against both suggestions," but nausea could have developed a sense in V.L. of "unpleasant situation, noise, quarrel" (cf. O.Prov. nauza "noise, quarrel"). Replaced native gedyn (see din).:biggrin5:
one not noted for its cultural aspects, but our library has most of Maugham's works and recently bought a 10-cd sets of The Razor's Edge. I am on cd #5 of the set now, but I have read the novel a few times as well.
If you want to buy on-line, try Abe, Alibris, or Biblio. I have had better luck with these than Amazon.com.
I have just checked Amazon and there are plenty of copies available.Quote:
Originally Posted by dfloyd
By whom?Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Bean
Whether it is noisy or not is not the issue here but whether people have a right to listen to and like this kind of music if they choose to do so.Quote:
I am in complete agreement with this sentiment because the etymology of the word is:
And whether we should respect their prefences...I was surprised that libraries did not have copies of Maugham's books... Not only the local branch but none in the county.Quote:
Originally Posted by dfloyd
I think I will go to Speedy Hen (my supermarket gives me some loyalty points, which I can use to buy books online). They deliver within 3 days, usually.
Thanks for the recommendations, Dfloyd and Brian :)
Thanks for the info on the Morgan bio, it does look interesting.Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Bean
What you say is true, I didn't find TRE dated. The story line is timeless.
As I mentioned however, I did find Larry's character, inner motivations to be a bit thin. I wanted more. Of course we can come to conclusions and speculate, but I'd have appreciated....not more physical detail, but for Larry to show more feeling. I know he was shell shocked, burned out but while I knew it, I didn't feel it. If that makes any sort of sense.
Yes it does make sense to some degree. I think that Maugham's problem was that he had to show Larry as being distanced from people by his wartime experience and this meant that he couldn't be shown in the round as the other characters are in the story. It is interesting that, although the novel centre's on an an incident during WWI, Maugham didn't write it until 1943/4 when he was living in America; having escaped from his home in France when the Germans invaded. It may be due to the fact that the inter-war years were a period when he was involved in writing plays and travelling around the Far East gathering material for his other novels and short stories.Quote:
Originally Posted by plainjane
as Plain Jane says, but wondering what it (life) was all about. Larry was, after all an aviator, not an infantryman, who would be more susceptible to shell shock. In the episode where Larry tells of his Irish friend, a fellow aviator, dying and not realizing he was going to until near the end, I think Maugham tells us all we need to know about Larry's war time experience. I don't think anyone can know what it was like to fly one of those glued- together WW1 aircraft which spit out 50 calibre machine-gun buulets, sometimes shooting off their own propellor if not properly synchronized. I wouldn't call Larry burnt out, but rather questioning his pre WWI values.
I don't want to preempt plainjane but I think she was using 'shell shocked' in a general sense rather than literally. Maugham served as an ambulance driver on the western front during the war and his description of his experiences there makes for grim reading. Presumably Larry would have been flying with the Lafayette squadron which lost about a fifth of their pilots during the conflict so I imagine he was pretty war-weary by the end.Quote:
Originally Posted by dfloyd
perhaps war weary. All of his friends in Chicago felt that Larry was suffering from what he had experienced in the war, and that he would eventually come around. That is, he would get back into the swing of things, get a job, and ride on the post war prosperity. Larry, however, didn't want this. Rather than suffering from the common elements of battle fatigue, he was suffering from having his prewar values destroyed. This is why I feel Maugham gives the reader enough to go on. Larry wasn't, as Graham Greene said in his own title, a Burnt-Out Case. He was in search of a new set of values. That is why he couldn't marry Isabelle and go back to Chicago. Telling more of Larry's war experience is unnecessary. He tells all when he is asked by Maugham what he wants to do and he replies, "Loaf, just loaf."
Yes, Brian, you are correct, I realized later that more what I meant was post-traumatic shock from being in battle, and seeing his friend[s] die.
Certainly that is a terrible thing in itself, with long reaching effects.
To me what it comes down to is that Maugham, in Larry's case at least, did not show us, he told us. Anyone can tell, but showing brings the story to a much higher and more effective level. Perhaps that is why Maugham said of himself......."I know just where I stand, in the very front row of the second-rate.” .........[from the NYT article I posted above].
Not such a bad position after all, and the quote shows a brutal honesty about himself that is rare enough in this world. He is to be commended IMO.
Well it would have been difficult for Maugham to show rather than tell for two reasons. First, as the narrator he had to tell at second hand what had happened to Larry on his travels, if he had abandoned using the first person, the connecting thread between Larry and the other characters, namely Maugham himself, would have been broken.Quote:
Originally Posted by plainjane
Secondly, Maugham actually described himself as a teller of tales, so he was more inclined to tell rather than show what was happening.
It's true that anyone can tell, but few have told their stories with such telling effect.
It is also true that he didn't write for posterity. He knew his limitations but within those limits he is one of the best writers of the twentieth century.
It's not for nothing that there has been fierce competition for many of his original manuscripts by university libraries; most of them American unfortunately.