This discussion began in the Viewing Room social group.
I've recently seen Alfred Hitchcock's Notorious for the second time and I know I am going to be burned at the stake for this, but even though I enjoyed it and found it very good, there was something troubling me throughout it, and I simply can't consider it the Master's best film, IMHO.
Though I must certainly admit that it has some of the most masterful shots in all of Hitchcock's work, and definitley has one of Bergman's and Grant's best performances.
I don't know, there was just something about it that made me hesitate at comparing it to the Master's greatest.
Alright come at me.

